Home

 

 

 

 

In order to pare thee pages down to a level where it can be published,i will limit the pages to THIS file and the testimony pages. which most people haven't read in total. profits from this book in this form will be used to publish all of the other pages in a second volume.

Oswald Never would have been convicted at Trial for 2 reasons.

#1. He was innocent.

#2. The authorities "Tampered" with the evidence repeatedly.

Destroy/Alter/Withhold Evidence

1.   Cleaned out the limo at Parkland with a bucket of water within minutes of the shooting.

2   Destroying Oswald’s note to Dallas FBI Office

       SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/fbi_hosty.htm

      CASE DISMISSED

3   Withholding Hosty’s name, address, phone number and license plate number from Oswald's notebook.  

     SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/fbi_hosty.htm

CASE DISMISSED

      4   Altering Walker back yard photo. (3 times)  see walker page

     SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm

     CASE DISMISSED

45  Changing Walker bullet from “Steel-Jacketed” to Copper Jacket

     SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm

    CASE DISMISSED

6  Changing transcript of Oswald’s radio debate.  

     SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/altering_evidence.htm

    CASE DISMISSED

7   Lying when claiming Paper for gun bag matched TSBD paper.  

      

    CASE DISMISSED

8   Lying by stating Oswald had No connection to CIA. (see Spy Stuff))

     SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/spy.htm

    CASE DISMISSED

9  Lying about Oswald going to Mexico City.

     SEE>>>    http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm

    CASE DISMISSED

10   Washing out Limo at Parkland Hospital thus Destroying evidence within minutes.  

     SEE>>>     http://whokilledjfk.net/you_asked_for_it.htm (items 31-3)

    CASE DISMISSED

11  Stealing body from Dallas jurisdiction under Gun Point.  

     SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/videopg.htm

     CASE DISMISSED

12  Stealing Limo from Dallas Jurisdiction under Gun Point..  

      SEE>>>   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01oaxb00dIE

     CASE DISMISSED

13  Destroying part 3 of P O Box Rental Application.  

       SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm

     CASE DISMISSED

14  Showed LHO 133A BEFORE (sat. noon-Sat evening) it was Found.  WCR App XI  

Showed Mike Paine back yard photo on Friday night.  it wasn't fopund until sat afternoon.

       SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/Rifle.htm  (ITEMS 15-16)

     CASE DISMISSED

15  Dry Cleaning/Pressing JBC’s Clothing.  

      SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/cleaned_and_pressed.htm

     CASE DISMISSED

16 Switch Entrance/Exit wounds on JBC’s Wrist would.  

      SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/john_connally.htm

     CASE DISMISSED

17  JFK’s brain missing.  

       SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/missing_brain.htm

     CASE DISMISSED

18  Autopsy slides missing.  

       SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/hsca_volume_vii_____missing_slid.htm

     CASE DISMISSED

19  Alteration of “Z” film.  See Zapruder Film Page

      SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/zapruder%20film.htm

     CASE DISMISSED

20  Suborning Perjury from a witness. 

      SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/volume_v_sgt.htm

  CASE DISMISSED

21  Impersonating Oswald BEFORE Assassination.

      SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/ODIO.htm

      CASE DISMISSED

22   Intimidating Witnesses

      SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/SYLVIA.htm

23  Locking up records for 75 years     

      CASE DISMISSED

24  Lied about "Re-using" Mexico City audio tapes.

      SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm

      CASE DISMISSED

25  Destroyed Oswald's Postal Records Illegally.

      SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm

   

26.  Leibler's attempt to seduce Sylvia Odio incident

  CASE DISMISSED 

27.  refused legal representation for Oswald

CASE DISMISSED

28. FORCING A WIFE TO TESTIFY AGAINST HER HUSBAND

  CASE DISMISSED

29. why did the fbi lie about loren hall, gonzales & seymour being at sylvia odio's's "  case    CASE DISMISSED


look at this one about wcr supporters.

 

WHO was todd vaughan?>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm

His claim to be well read on the subject not only maskes him a LIAR;

It makes him a "Criminal Liar" ! ! !

Which explains why he's posted under Aliases for the past year.






"Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2005@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:d317b8fb-fe26-44b5-a58d-60eb81864620@y19g2000yqy.googlegroups.com...

Same ole' same ole' - little Benny Nancy Pants.

I told you I'd answer you when the time was right, and on my terms,
not yours.



On Jul 18, 1:32 pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
> Time to repost this updated classic... First, a recap: I mentioned the FBI
> intimidation that occurred for so many of the eyewitnesses, and Toddy
> demanded
> some examples... so I was happy to oblige. Toddy then claimed that he
> could
> demolish all these examples, but his refutations were all in a file
> cabinet that
> was in storage.
>
> Of course, this was years ago, and still no refutation.
>
> Toddy *asked* for this post. Now, he's too gutless to respond to it.
>
> Toddy simply lied. First posted in 2005 - Toddy keeps telling everyone
> that
> he'll answer it when he 'gets around to it'. Of course, he never will.
>
> Although Toddy's been running from this post for quite some time, others
> have
> too, Eddie "Disgrace to the Corps" Dolan, and Chuckie Schuyler, to name
> just
> two. Other LNT'ers are too smart to get close to this post.
>
> All you ever need to shut up the LNT'ers is the evidence...
>
> ********************************
> Todd, just like other LNT'ers, refuse to see what is right before their
> eyes,
> and refuse to attempt to explain it when it becomes clear that they can't
> refute
> it.
>
> Todd didn't like it very much when I asserted:
>
> ********************************
> Since the FBI, as early as Saturday, was *telling* eyewitnesses that there
> were
> only three shots, coaching eyewitnesses to say what the FBI wanted to
> hear, it's
> amazing that we have as many accounts as we do that there were more.
>
> Mr. BELIN. How many shots did you hear, if you remember?
> Mr. EDWARDS. Well, I heard one more than was fired, I believe.
>
> And considering the number of people who've come forward to state that
> their
> affidavits and even *testimony* was changed, again, it's simply amazing
> that as
> much evidence as we have is still left in the record.
> ********************************
>
> But Todd won't actually *respond* to this... s




You're lying.

I did respond to this.

Why do you lie?


o let's add some more accounts to
> the fire. That way, Todd can ignore even *more* accounts:
>
> Richard Randolf Carr was a steelworker watching the motorcade from the
> Courthouse building. He testified:
>
> Q: Mr. Carr, did you talk to any FBI agents about this incident?
> A: Yes, I did.
> Q: Did they tell you to forget about it?
> MR. DYMOND: I object to that as hearsay.
> BY MR. GARRISON:
> Q: Were you threatened in any way --
> THE COURT: I sustain the objection. You cannot tell us the words used by
> someone
> who spoke to you because of hearsay; however, you can state that you had
> conversations with them and what did you do as a result of the
> conversation, I
> will permit that.
> BY MR. GARRISON:
> Q: As the result of the conversations with the Federal Bureau of
> Investigation,
> what did you do?
> A: I done as I was instructed, I shut my mouth.
> Q: Were you called to testify before the Warren Commission?
> A: No, sir.
>
> Carr told researchers Gary Shaw and Larry Harris: "The FBI came to my
> house-there were two of them-and they said they heard I witnessed the
> assassination and I said I did. They told me, 'If you didn't see Lee
> Harvey
> Oswald up in the School Book Depository with a rifle, you didn't witness
> it.'" I
> said, 'Well, the man I saw on television that they tell me is Lee Harvey
> Oswald
> was not in the window of the School Book Depository. That's not the man.'
> And
> (one of the agents) said I better keep my mouth shut. He did not ask me
> what I
> saw, he told me what I saw."
>
> But perhaps Todd doesn't find anything strange about reports such as this.
> After all, he's questioned eyewitnesses himself, and has the solution to
> the
> case. Yet explaining why eyewitnesses were threatened poses a problem ...
> one
> that he won't address.
>
> Ed Hoffman, the deaf mute who belatedly came forward and claimed to have
> seen
> two men with a rifle behind the picket fence on the grassy knoll, stated
> that
> he'd been warned by an FBI agent to keep quiet "or you might get killed."
>
> Then we have an attorney, Carroll Jarnagin, who reported being an
> eyewitness to
> a meeting between LHO and Ruby. According to an interview he gave Marrs,
> FBI
> agents, instead of investigating his potentially explosive revelations,
> tried
> accusing him of hallucinating. Jarnagin asserted that their conduct was
> "clearly abuse of a witness."
>
> Moving along to more august eyewitnesses, Senator Ralph Yarborough was
> shocked
> at the treatment he received from the Warren Commission staff (admittedly
> not
> the FBI, but related). He stated that they "walked in like they were a
> couple
> of deputy sheriffs and and I was a bank robber." They tried to pressure
> him to
> sign a statement that closed with "This is all I know about the
> assassination"
> and when he refused, they kept pressuring him, saying "you're holding this
> up,"
> and demanded he sign the statement. As Yarborough told Jim Marrs in 1986,
> "...I
> typed one up myself and put basically what I told you about how the cars
> all
> stopped. I put in there, 'I don't want to hurt anyone's feelings but for
> the
> protection of future presidents, they should be trained to take off when a
> shot
> is fired."
>
> If a United States Senator can be treated this way, imagine the lack or
> respect
> those "investigating" the assassination accorded the average citizen.
> David
> Powers, as I previously mentioned, was another who asserted that he'd been
> "pressured" to lie to the Warren Commission. Interestingly, he must have
> resisted quite well, since his deposition is certainly not one that the WC
> would
> have welcomed. Perhaps this is why he was never questioned... or more
> accurately - when he *WAS* questioned by Arlen Spector, why his testimony
> was
> never put in the record.
>
> (Now is perhaps a good time to mention that Todd had no response to make
> when I
> mentioned an example of the tremendous coverup going on, that: "As just
> one of
> the simple examples, care to defend the fact that the *closest* non-limo
> eyewitness to the murder, *a policeman* at that, was never questioned by
> anyone
> prior to the WCR being released?
>
> Nor can you argue that the WC was unaware of him - Anyone can view the
> Altgen's
> photo, and see him for themselves."
>
> Todd couldn't find the strength to respond to this... but perhaps this
> isn't
> covered in the "Lone Nutter's Handbook".
>
> Moving on... David Lifton reports Tomlinson's account, who history has
> recorded
> as the finder of CE 399, and who was called by the FBI that night - after
> midnight, and being told to keep his mouth shut about what he'd found.
> Tomlinson
> noted that "And they have a way to make a believer out of you".
>
> Mark Lane records this statement of Jean Hill: "For two years I have told
> the
> truth, but I have two children to support and I am a public school
> teacher. My
> principal said it would be best not to talk about the assassination, and I
> just
> can't go through it all again. I can't believe the Warren Report. I know
> it's
> all a lie, because I was there when it happened, but I can't talk about it
> anymore because I don't want the FBI here constantly and I want to
> continue to
> teach here. I hope you don't think I'm a coward but I cannot talk about
> the case
> anymore." But noooo... we must listen to Todd, he carefully coaches us
> that
> there has not been any FBI intimidation in this case.
>
> Another good example is also given by Mark Lane, the curious incident of
> Mrs.
> Tice - and considering that the Warren Commission flatly lied about her
> testimony, it's quite interesting indeed: "Mrs. Tice told the FBI that she
> had
> been visited by a man who claimed to be a reporter and who asked her to
> repeat
> the story about seeing Ruby at Parkland Hospital which she had previously
> told
> to Ruby's sister. After Mrs. Tice related the incident to him, the man
> advised
> her 'not to talk about this'. Shortly before her WC testimony, Mrs. Tice
> received the following anonymous phone call:
>
> Tice: Hello.
> Male Caller: Mrs. Tice?
> Tice: Hello.
> Male Caller: It would pay you to keep your mouth shut.
> (Rush to Judgment, pg 273)
>
> Another example given by Mark Lane is eyewitness Jean Hill:
>
> "Jean hill said that after she had originally spoken with me in February
> 1964
> 'the FBI was here for days. They practically lived here. They just didn't
> like
> what I told them I saw and heard when the President was assassinated.' She
> declined to permit a filmed interview, stating, 'For two years I have told
> the
> truth, but I have two children to support and I am a public school
> teacher. My
> principal said it would be best not to talk about the assassination, and I
> just
> can't got through it all again. I can't believe the Warren Report. I know
> it's
> all a lie, because I was there when it happened, but I can't talk about it
> anymore because I don't want the FBI here constantly and I want to
> continue to
> teach here. I hope you don't think I'm a coward, but I cannot talk about
> the
> case anymore." (Rush to Judgment, pg 285)
>
> In Tip O'Neill's book Man of The House, O'Neill describes a conversation
> with
> O'Donnell, who told him he was sure that two shots had come from the fence
> behind the grassy knoll. (As does Powers) O'Neill said to O'Donnell,
> "That's not
> what you told the Warren Commission." O'Donnell responded, "You're right,
> I told
> the FBI what I had heard, but they said it couldn't have happened that way
> and
> that I must have been imagining things. So I testified the way they wanted
> me
> to. I just didn't want to stir up any more pain and trouble for the
> family." But
> nooooo... we must listen to Todd... who will tell you that no such thing
> ever
> happened. (or, more accurately, will simply refuse to respond.)
>
> While I'm quite sure that this is an incomplete list, when we have a
> record of
> eyewitness intimidation such as this - what explanation does Todd offer?
>
> Why... none at all.
>
> Congratulations, Todd!
I BEAT THE SHIT OUT OF TOAD SO MANY TIMES WITH OFFICIAL EVIDENCE/TESTIMONY THT HE NO LONGER POSTS HERE.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ben Holmes
> Learn to Make Money with a Website -http://www.burningknife.com
 

one of these days he'll run into someone who will kill the bastard..

 

 

 

 

 

Contact Information  tomnln@cox.net

 

Page Visited

Hit Counter

Times