Photos of Parkland medical
people describing back of the head wound on JFK.
WHAT are the odds that ALL of these
witnesses are Wrong???
Volume XVIII page 801 below.
Douglas Kiker was a big time
newspaper man back in the Sixties.
Thanks to Gil Jesus, here's a
list of Videos proving same.
Headwound As Seen At Bethesda Naval Hospital
The Headwound As Seen At Parkland Hospital
For a more complete & detailed listing compiled by Dr. Gary
Aguilar follow this link.
The photographs here have been stolen from Robert Groden's
compendious photographic compilation in
"The Killing of a President"
The purpose of this page is to illustrate the (apparent) incompatibility
between the 'back of the head' autopsy photographs (below) and the witness
testimony. The autopsy photo shows the obvious and universally admitted 'right
front' flap. The evidence is that there were in fact
'major' flaps, one of them being at the right rear. (See
Dr Boswell - one of the autopsy doctors -
maintains that he was lifting such a flap over the back of the head in the photo
Drawing executed by Bell for the ARRB
|"Audrey Bell gave me a very explicit description of the
flap, which was lifted for her by one of the doctors to show her the
large defect. She is very sure that it was hinged at the top, and not at
the bottom as in the photograph. She told me numerous times that "there
was a lot of scalp missing in the back though."
Autopsy personnel have also described this flap in extensive detail.
James Metzler described it in exactly the same place and facing the same
way as did Bell, to both myself and Mark Crouch, in the studios of WCHE,
Crouch's radio station, in West Chester, Pennsylvania, on May 1, 1991.
The description was repeated to me in the same detail by Jerrol Custer.7
Dr. Robert McClelland also described this flap, but every one of these
witnesses, and more, insists that it was hanging downward, hinged at the
top to the left."
(Harry Livingstone High Treason 2 p 316)
"-Although only in Trauma Room One for 3-5 minutes, she did see the head
wound. After asking Dr.
Perry ďwhere is the wound,Ē she said he turned the Presidentís head
slightly to the Presidentís anatomical
left, so that she could see a right rear posterior head wound, which she
described as occipital in both her
oral remarks, and in her drawings;
-She said she could see brain and spinal fluid coming out of the wound,
but could not tell what type of
brain tissue it was;
-She said it was her recollection that the right side of the Presidentís
head, and the top of his head,
were intact, which is why she had to ask Dr. Perry where the wound was
in the first place."(04/l 4/97 Summary of ARRB interview)
||GENE AIKIN, MD: "The back of the
right occipitalparietal portion of his head was shattered with
brain substance extruding." (WC-V6:65.)
||CHARLES RUFUS BAXTER, MD: "...the
right temporal and occipital bones were missing (emphasis added)
and the brain was lying on the table..." (WR:523).
Drawing executed by Bowron. (Livingstone, 'Killing the Truth')
|NURSE DIANA HAMILTON BOWRON: "...there was blood all
over this neck and shoulders. There was a gaping
wound in the back of his head." (Livingstone, Killing the Truth ,
||KEMP CLARK, MD: Professor and Director of Neurological
Surgery at Parkland,
"...in the occipital region of the skull...
Through the head wound, blood and brain were extruding... There was a
large wound in the right occipitoparietal region,
from which profuse bleeding was occurring... There was considerable loss
of scalp and bone tissue. Both cerebral and
cerebellar tissue were extruding from the wound." (WC--CE#392)
||CHARLES JAMES CARRICO, MD: "The (skull) wound that I saw
was a large gaping wound, located in the right
occipitoparietal area. I would estimate to be about 5 to 7 cm. in
size, more or less circular, with avulsions of the
calvarium and scalp tissue. As I stated before, I believe there
was shredded macerated cerebral and cerebellar
tissues both in the wounds and on the fragments of the skull
attached to the dura." (6H6)
Drawing executed by Crenshaw for the ARRB
|CHARLES CRENSHAW, MD: It extended from the approximate
center of the skull in the back to just behind the right ear, utilizing
a left to right orientation and from a position a couple of inches above
the right ear to the approximate middle of the right ear utilizing a top
to bottom orientation." (FBI file # 89A-DL-60165-99)
|Don T. Curtis, D.D.S.: "The drawing by Dr. Robert
McClelland is essentially my recollection of the wound suffered by John
||RICHARD BROOKS DULANEY, MD:" The
wound was on the back of his head. On the back side" They lifted up the
head and "the whole back-side was gone." (Groden R., Livingston,
H., High Treason. 1989 New York, Berkley Books, p.460.)
Drawing executed by Grossman for the ARRB
|ROBERT GROSSMAN, MD:"He (Grossman) said that he saw two
large holes in the head, as he told the (Boston) Globe,
and he described a large hole squarely in the
occiput, far too large for a bullet entry wound...".
" the second was a larger wound in the right parietal region (which he
characterized as an
exit wound) that was not an open hole in the cranium, but rather a plate
of bone, about 6 cm in longest
dimension, lifted up from the inside, which could really only be seen
when Dr. Clark lifted up some of the
Presidentís hair" ( Grossman ARRB interview)
||PAT HUTTON, RN : "Mr. Kennedy was bleeding profusely
from a wound in the back of his head, and
was lying there unresponsive." (Price Exhibit V21 H 216). While helping
with resuscitation efforts a physician asked her to apply a pressure
dressing to the head wound, she observed, however, that, "This was no
use, however, because of the massive opening in
the back of the head." (IBID)
||MARION THOMAS JENKINS, MD: "a great laceration on the
right side of the head (temporal and occipital) (sic), causing a great
defect in the skull plate so that there was herniation and laceration of
great areas of the brain, even to the extent that the
cerebellum had protruded from the wound."
||RONALD COY JONES: ..".he had a large wound in the right
posterior side of the head... There was large defect in the back side of
the head as the President lay on the cart with what appeared to be some
brain hanging out of this wound with multiple pieces of skull noted next
with the brain and with a tremendous amount of clot and blood."
|ROBERT McCLELLAND, MD: "...I could
very closely examine the head wound, and I noted that the right
posterior portion of the skull had been extremely blasted. It had been
shattered...so that the parietal bone was protruded up through the scalp
and seemed to be fractured almost along its right posterior half, as
well as some of the occipital bone being fractured in its lateral half,
and this sprung open the bones that I mentioned in such a way that you
could actually look down into the skull cavity itself and see that
probably a third or so, at least, of the brain tissue, posterior
cerebral tissue and some of the cerebellar tissue had been blasted
"There was no hole on that picture [the
autopsy 'back of the head' pictures - see bottom of page ] that looked
like that. And I said,. Well, I think I know what that is. I think it
may be because if you notice there are some fingers at the top of the
photograph apparently pulling a flap of scalp forward, and I think the
flap was being pulled over that opening when they took the pictures."
(ARRB) [McClelland surmises what
Dr Boswell says
actually the case]
The letters McC (for McClelland) identify the
functioned as a hinge for a bone flap that could swing either
open or closed. This movement has been the cause of much confusion
about the status of the occiput: when the flap was open (as at Parkland)
it produced an orange sized hole at the tight rear, but when closed
(as on the frontal X-ray) it seemed that there was no major hole at
the right rear. I have named this hinge after McClelland, who actually
described the bone flap. This fracture is also visible on the frontal
Mantik, 'Murder In Dealey Plaza', p 282.
||MALCOLM PERRY, MD:: "I looked at the head wound briefly
by leaning over the table and noticed that the
parietal occipital head wound was largely avulsive and there was visible
brain tissue in the macard and some cerebellum seen..."
(HSCA-V7:302-interview with Purdy 1-11-78.
"Writer Jimmy Breslin, who interviewed some of the Parkland
doctors for an account published on Sunday Nov 24, reported the
existence of a "huge flap" in the "occipito-parietal,
which is a part of the back of the head."
(Lifton, pp 321 pbk)
An article appeared in some US papers on the 24th November 1963 as a
"special from the
New York Herald Tribune." It is obvious the author had interviewed
Perry. In it, the author notes:
The wound in the throat was small and neat. Blood was running out of
it, too fast. The occipito parietal, which is a part of the back of
the head, had a huge flap."
(Thanks to Barb Junkkarinen for this information.)
||PAUL PETERS, MD:"...I noticed that there was a
large defect in the occiput...It seemed to
me that in the right occipitalparietal area that there was a large
"The X rays of President Kennedy's skull, which we privileged to see
later, showed dramatically how large the
the skull was and was easily compatible with
what Bob saw originally. There was a big hunk of bone sticking up
there in the parietal....
I thought just exactly what Bob, did. They were
probably making a series of pictures and
they had just pulled that flap back up there to cover it up and took a
picture of that to show the head with the flap restored, so to speak,
for whatever reason. I'm sure there were many other pictures that
were made at the same time.
...I think that [McClelland's drawing] pretty much corresponds to what I
said, occipitoparietal. It looks a little further down in the occiput in
this picture, I think, but it was pretty far posteriorly because you had
to be able to see the cerebellum -- " (Peters, ARRB
Parkland doctors interview)
|" But the scalp was lacerated, & a pretty good sized
piece of the frontal
& right occipital portion of the skull had
separated and were stuck to
the undersurface of the scalp. "
Boswell, interviewed by Livingstone, High Treason 2, p196
Q So you're saying that on the fourth view,
which are the photographs that are in your hand
right now, the scalp has been pulled back and
folded back over the top of the head in a way
different from the way that they appeared in the
third view, the superior view of the head?
Q Is that fair?
A In the previous one, it was permitted just
to drop. In this one, it's pulled forward up over
the forehead, toward the forehead.
Q Who, if you recall, pulled up the scalp
for the photograph to be taken?
[Colour autopsy photo. The yellow hashed
area marks the approximate location of the skull defect according to a
skull Boswell marked for the ARRB ]
A There are about three of us involved here,
because there are two right hands on that
centimeter scale. I think that I probably was
pulling the scalp up.
" Well, this was an attempt to illustrate the magnitude of the
wound again. And as you can see itís 10 centimeters from right to left, 17
meters from posterior to anterior. This was a piece of 10 centimeter bone that
was fractured off of the skull and was attached to the under surface of the
skull. . . There were fragments attached to the skull or to the scalp and all
major flaps." (Boswell, interviewed by the HSCA FPP)
Boswell is explicit that the skull is missing beneath the scalp in the
autopsy picture, above :
Q ...Now I'd like to ask you a question
about what is underneath the scalp of what we are
looking at now. Let's take the marking that
appears towards the hairline right at the base of
the neck, or where the hairline meets the neck. If
we take the point above that, where would you say
that the scalp is or that the skull will be missing
underneath the scalp that we can view there?
A Probably right about here.
Q So you're--
A Just about the base of the ear.
Q So you're pointing to approximately
halfway up the ruler that we can observe and to the
right of that small fragment, so the skull is
back to top
Headwound As Seen At Bethesda Naval Hospital
looking for books?