Home
Up
JACKIE TALKS OF CONSPIRACY

 

 

INTERN BULLSHIT

 

A Storm in a (Mimi) Teacup 02/07/2012

2 Comments

Let me say right now, I have a few problems with the latest Kennedy scandal.

Problem One: the accusation that a bunch of clueless young things without any secretarial skills were hired as interns to be the play things of JFK and pals.

It simply isn't true. Or at least, it certainly was not what Barbara Gamarekian told Dallek. The mild Ms Gamarekian was incensed enough by what Dallek wrote that she sent a letter of complaint to the editor of the New York Times dated May 25, 2003 and which I will quote here in its entirety:

To the Editor:

In my oral history for the Kennedy Library that Robert Dallek drew upon for his book ''An Unfinished Life: John F. Kennedy, 1917-1963,'' I never used the term ''intern'' (which resonates so today) in speaking of Mimi Fahnestock, who worked for two summers in the White House press office.

During a recent conversation with a former co-worker in that office, I observed, ''We didn't even have an intern program back then, did we?''


My former colleague replied: ''But don't you remember? Nora Ephron worked for us one summer as an intern.''

Nora Ephron! Surely I would have remembered Nora Ephron!

So thank you, Ms. Ephron, for your delightful ''All the President's Girls'' (Op-Ed, May 18).

It brought back vivid memories of that happy, congested workspace where we all operated within arm's length of each other.

It is true. There was no extra desk.


Okay. There it is. There was NO INTERN PROGRAM. One intern hired by Pierre Sallinger... future script-writer, Nora Ephron.

And what did Ms Ephron have to say in "All the President's Girls"? She didn't remember ever meeting Mimi and laments being the only girl JFK had contact with that he didn't make a pass at.

Problem Two: the timing.

2003:the story breaks the year of the 40th anniversary of the assassination.

2012: the story breaks out again in the lead up to the 50th anniversary with the release of a tell-all book by Ms Whatevernamesheusesthesedays.

Problem Three: relates to problem two. You see, here is what Ms Mimi said in 2003:

(excerpt from the Age, May 17, 2003)
Ms Lewinsky levered her fame into a tell-all book, a handbag business, and, most recently, a television job as host of a dating show, Mr Personality.

Mrs Fahnestock, now 60, revealed no such ambitions yesterday and issued a curt statement. "
From June 1962 to November 1963, I was involved in a sexual relationship with President Kennedy. For the last 41 years, it is a subject that I have not discussed," she said.

"
In view of the recent media coverage, I have now discussed the relationship with my children and my family, and they are completely supportive.

"I will have no further comment on this subject, period. I would request that the media respect my privacy and the privacy of my family in this matter."

Book launch anyone...?

Problem Four: The so-called "Bahamas Incident"

Here is how it was reported in 2003 - from the same Age story as above:

In the Bahamas, Mimi was spotted by aides after the Macmillan summit hiding in one of the cars waiting to take the president to the airport. According to the transcript, "they walked over and looked in the car and here seated on the floor was Mimi."

The aides said nothing and neither did the press, who knew all about JFK's girls. Mrs Gamarekian said at the time: "This is the sort of thing that legitimate newspaper people don't write about or don't even make any implications about. It was kind of a big joke."


Okay. You got? "They" ALL knew about it because "they" ALL saw it. Or did they? I mean, you don't really forget things like that, do you?

Yet here is what TIME reported on May 26. 2003:
Mimi surfaced in a roundabout way. At the Kennedy Library, author Robert Dallek, when writing his new J.F.K. biography, An Unfinished Life, came across an oral history done in 1964 by one of the gentlest, most ardent Kennedy supporters in existence, Barbara Gamarekian. In it Gamarekian, who had worked in the White House press office and later became a reporter for the New York Times, talks about Mimi; but she had embargoed that section of her reminiscences. Dallek persuaded her to release it.

At first, the old White House reporters had a hard time recalling Mimi. But at a monthly luncheon last week, we pieced together sightings of her slipping out of Air Force One and confirmed Gamarekian's account of the top of a female head being seen in one of the limousines in Kennedy's motorcade at the 1962 Bermuda summit with British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan. When staff and reporters looked in, Mimi was sitting on the floor of the car like a child playing hide-and-seek.

So... at a Press piss up... they "pieced" it together after initially NOT RECALLING HER AT ALL? Well, that's certainly solid evidence for it! I can just imagine how that conversation went...

Problem five: The church

Her former employer was The Fifth Avenue Presbyterian Church which has a long association with Republican Big Wigs including Bush II advisors such as Glenn Hubbard back to Charles D Hiller, Sr. chairman of the GOP National Committee from 1912 to 1916, and national committeeman from New York from 1920-1937.

Problem Six: Mimi's alleged lack of qualifications to work with WH press gang...

She had been editor of her college newspaper. In any case, apparently there was nothing to type on in her work area.

Did Kennedy have a fling with Mimi? Who knows? Probably? Maybe? What is certain is that the story has been beaten up to within an inch of it's life. There was no intern program (real or pretend) and ergo, no gaggle of gigglers at JFK's disposal. The only intern there at the time laments that she was
not seduced by Kennedy. The two times the story has hit the headlines have been just prior to major anniversaries regarding the assassination - with such stories cutting away at the public's ability to care about the fact that Kennedy was taken out by a coup d'etat. Despite reports that "everyone" remembered her and her liaisons with Kennedy - the Times exposed that as a lie in 2003 when it revealed no one recalled her that really should have - until they all got together for a "luncheon" and "pieced" it together.

A tour of the web tells me that there is little or no skepticism about this story at all. It is being accepted by just about everyone as the Gospel Truth.

A two-fingered salute to the Power of the Big Lie.