Home
MAX HOLLAND

 

 

 

 

 

The Conspiracy to Assassinate President Kennedy was covered up by Elements of Government and, National News Media.

This page is reserved to illustrate the News Media's participation in that cover-up.

Start with the question of HOW can a private Business BUY Evidence in the Crime of the Century?  On Saturday morning Life Magazine Bought the Zapruder Film, paying $150,000 for that Zapruder Film.

WHY would Life Magazine Refuse to produce that film to an Authorized District Attorney (Jim Garrison) when that film is needed in a Trial of accused conspirator Clay Shaw?

WHY would that film request Require a Subpoena?  

WHY would that Subpoena be fought by Life Magazine all the way to the United states Supreme Court?

HOW can that Private Business then REFUSE to show that Film to the American Public?

HOW can that Private Business then LIE about the contents of that film?

After owning the "Z" Film for 2 weeks, in the December 6, issue on page 52F here's what Life said about the film we were Never going to see.

Notice that the throat wound was STILL an Wound of Entrance. 

Notice how Life Lied about how JFK had an Entrance in the throat by Lying.

The united States Supreme court ruled in favor of Jim Garrison.

Once Garrison got the film, bootleg copies showed up all over the Research Community.

The First time the "Z" Film was ever shown on National TV is in 1975 when Geraldo Rivera hosted a TV Show called "Goodnight America".

Rivera had 2 guests named Bob Groden and, Dick Gregory.    Once they Showed the "Z" film on National TV the "cat was outta the bag" so to speak.  That's when Life Magazine sold the film back to the Zapruder family for $1.00 after paying $150.000 for it.


Anothe Life Magazine employee is Richard Billings. Read what Loran Eugene Hall said about Billings when questioned by the HSCA.  (below)

 

HOW can the New York Times publish a Full Page Laudatory Editorial Edifying the 26 Volumes only 1 day after they were released?

There isn't a Human on earth who read 10 million words in 1 day let alone evaluate/remember them.


 

HOW can Dan Rather get away with the Lies he told about the Zapruder Film? (see Dan Rather Lies Page under Zapruder Film Page)

http://whokilledjfk.net/ratherlies.htm

Below shows ABC's plans to Sabotage Jim Garrison.                  (Giving a whole new meaning to "Freedom of the Press")                                                     

 

Below is the "instructions from the CIA to the media on exactly how to handle critism of thee Warren Repor

 

  MEDIA & the CIA

http://danwismar.com/uploads/Bernstein%20-%20CIA%20and%20Media.htm


the time differential between Dallas and, Christchurch, New Zealand is seventeen (17) hours

How did New Zealand know Oswald had lived in Russia before it was known in Dallas? ? ? ?

 

 

 


 

                                                     FREEDOM OF THE PRESS

 The defenders of the Warren Report are ABSOLUTELY correct….

 "It would take an enormous amount of people conspiring to effect a conspiracy of this magnitude. Surely, some of them would leak the truth sooner or later."

 

 Indeed there were an enormous amount of people engaged in the conspiracy. Some ACTIVELY. (Knowingly) Some PASSIVELY. (Unknowingly) Some were "DUPED" into participating in the Cover-Up.

 

 PASSIVE: Parkland Drs. in Dallas . (Conspiracy of Silence)

 PASSIVE: Presidents Nixon, Carter, Reagan, Bush and Clinton (Conspiracy of Silence)

 

 ACTIVE:  Bethesda Drs. in D.C. Humes, Boswell & Finke. (Lying about JFK's wounds.)

 ACTIVE:  Warren Commission members. (Intentionally issuing a false Report.

 ACTIVE:  Some Warren Commission staff members. (Looking the other way during  the commission of a felony.)

 ACTIVE:  HOOVER AND THE FBI. Witholding evidence, & information, Tampering with witnesses and evidence.

 ACTIVE:  CIA.Tampering with evidence, Lying & Witholding evidence.

 ACTIVE:  LBJ, (With one stroke of a pen the evidence was locked away for 75 years.)

 

 WHAT MAKES OUR SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT SO GREAT IS THAT IT CONSISTS OF THREE (3) SEPERATE BRANCHES; EXECUTIVE, JUDICIAL & LEGISLATIVE.

 In other words our Government has a CHECKS & BALANCES system built into it. (Sort of an insurance policy against corruption)

 It's sort of like when one of these branches screws up the other branches are there to insure that the faux pas will see the light of day. (Something similar to the way Watergate worked.)

 I believe that on the preceding pages I showed that ALL THREE Branches dropped the ball on the Kennedy Assassination.

  1. EXECUTIVE- LBJ for conspiring to hide the truth by locking away the evidence for 75 years with one stroke of the pen.

  2. JUDICIAL- Chief Justice of the Supreme Court conspiring to issue a FALSE report. Acting Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach ORDERING the end result before the investigation even started. FBI, State of Texas and Dallas Law Enforcement participating in a FRAME-UP and a COVER-UP. Not to mention the collusion in the      murder of one FBI informant (Oswald) by another FBI informant (Ruby).

 3. LEGISLATIVE-Two Commission Members, Russell & Cooper coming from the Senate and Two Commission Members Boggs & Ford coming from the House of Reps. Along with a Former Dir. of CIA Dulles and a Former head of The World Bank McCloy. Collectively conspired to issue a FALSE Report.

 

  BUT NOT TO WORRY! BECAUSE OF OUR "CONSTITUTION" THERE HAS ALWAYS BEEN AN UNOFFICIAL FOURTH BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT KNOWN AS THE PRESS.

  In the unlikely event that the three branches of Government would collectively enter into a conspiracy to commit a crime or even willingly become an accessory after the fact by conspiring to COVER_UP a crime. We could always rely on the unofficial fourth branch of government, THE PRESS! (In these times "The Press" is defined as The Print Media and The Electronic Media. i.e. Radio & Television.)

 

  In addition to what I wrote above about TIME-LIFE Inc., I suggest you go to the library for a copy of "The Montreal Star" 9/12/77 for an article reprinted from the New York Times about the NEXT issue of ROLLING STONE Magazine. It contains an article by reporter Carl Bernstein (of Watergate fame). Bernstein tells of a working relationship between the CIA and some 400 journalists of the New York Times, CBS and a dozen other news organizations since 1952.  

 You can also check out remarks of former CBS reporter Sig Mickelson to the effect that CBS reporters had the approval of CBS head William Paley in the 50's. The approval to work with the CIA for the purpose of disseminating MIS-INFORMATION to the American public. (Cronkite/Rather worked for CBS!)

 

 NEWTIMES MAGAZINE Issue of July 11, 1975 has a great article by Jerry Policoff entitled "The Media and the Murder of John F. Kennedy".

 Just to whett your appetite I'll give you a small quote. This is from a letter to J. Lee Rankin, Chief Counsel to the Warren Commission. It's dated May 21, 1964. From Clifton Daniel, Ass't Managing Editor, N.Y. Times.

 

    "...It happens to be to our interest, as well as to the interest of the Commission and of the country, to obtain as wide a distribution of this document as we can. ..."

 

 ARE YOU GETTING THE PICTURE HERE FOLKS? THE DATE OF: MAY 21, 1964 IS FOUR (4) MONTHS BEFORE THE COMMISSION COMPLETED IT'S WORK AND RELEASED THE REPORT! (Lone Assassin, NO Conspiracy!)

 

 Further information on the collusion between the media and the Government can be found in Mark Lane 's book; A CITIZEN'S DISSENT.

 

 A greater understanding of the way the media works in concert with the government (CIA) is through the eyes of an "INSIDER" _Daniel Schoor, in his book CLEARING THE AIR".

 

  I understand that after more than a decade of recession the average Joe doesn't know why we're having the crime problem that exists today. He isn't aware of the changes this Country has gone  through since 1963 because he doesn't have the time to research it. He just knows there's TOO much crime and want's it stopped.

 The Politicians, Law Enforcement leaders and the Professionals of this Country (Medical & Lawyers) KNOW WELL that when the LEADERSHIP breaks Law and the LEADERSHIP covers it up, they CAN"T very well expect the masses to follow Law that those same LEADERS just proved no longer exists.

 

 In closing I want to thank authors such as Schiller, Ford, Belin, Posner, Roberts, Amrine, Anderson , Bishop, Curry, Epstein, Hartogs, Kirkwood , Manchester , Mayo and Sparrow. 

Up until the time that they wrote their books to either support the Warren Report or to ATTACK the critics I had read very little on the subject. (AP edition of the WR)

Whatever the critics wrote I couldn't verify because I didn't have the 26 Volumes either. (When I did gain access to the 26 Volumes, my goal was to discover that the critics were indeed SCAVENGERS. Needless to say I found the "credible critics" To be VERY CREDIBLE!

 It became very apparent that the subject was of magnanimous importance with the amount of books that were being written on the subject. What was REALLY mind-Boggling was the amount of books written for the sole purpose of discrediting the so called critics. I was never comfortable with the official version of JFK's Assassination. But I didn't know why. In those days Americans automatically accepted whatever our Government told us.

 

  MY HOPE IS THAT THESE WRITINGS AROUSED YOUR CUROSITY ENOUGH TO RESEARCH THE SUBJECT "THOROUGHLY" TO GET THE TRUE FACTS OF WHAT HAPPENED TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

 FOR MORE, SEE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/helsinki.htm

and, this

Priscilla-cia

 


| Part I | Part II | Part III | Update | PJM & CIA | Letters |

Priscilla Johnson McMillan
and the CIA

by Peter R. Whitmey

 

Comments will be forwarded. Email: Clint Bradford

 


In August, 1993, thousands of pages of CIA documents were made available to researchers at the National Archives that had been previously classified, including several documents associated with Priscilla Johnson McMillan, author of Marina and Lee, and the subject of several earlier articles by this writer.(1)

The first document, dated December 11, 1962 (and numbered 17456), is a "contact report," previously classified "secret," written by Donald Jameson, Chief SR/CA, which possibly stands for "Soviet Russia/Covert Actions." The report is based on a 90- minute meeting with Priscilla Johnson in her room at the Brattle Inn, located in Cambridge , Massachusetts . It was pointed out that, according to Mr. Butler at the "OO Office" in Boston , Priscilla was "...allowed to use the Harvard-Russian Research Center for her own work, mainly the writing of articles and a book, but that she has no other official relationship to the center."

Jameson described Priscilla as being "able, astute and conscientious," reflected also in her writing, but at the same time, was "rather nervous and shy," suggesting a "lack of self-confidence." He noted, however, that she certainly had a large number of Soviet contacts, and knew how to meet and talk to people. Jameson indicated at the outset of his report that Priscilla had been "selected as a likely candidate to write an article on Yevtushenko in a major U.S. magazine for our campaign." He recognized that Priscilla was "concerned about making her articles accurate as to fact and free from any external influence," but believed that "she might be worked around to writing an article in which she genuinly (sic) believed, but would also further our purposes for Yevtushenko" (a popular Russian poet).

Much of the report is a summary of Jameson's discussion with Priscilla about various Russian poets and Yevtushenko especially, whom the CIA seemed to be particularly interested in. Priscilla informed Jameson that she had arranged to write several articles for The Reporter - including one on Yevtushenko - and emphasized that "she thought she must write only the truth, without defining exactly what that was to me."

In conclusion, Jameson pointed out that, despite what she had stated:

"I think that Miss Johnson can be encouraged to write pretty much the articles we want. It will require a little more contact and discussion, but I think she could come around ... Basically, if approached with sympathy in the cause she considers most vital, I believe she would be interested in helping us in many ways. It would be important to avoid making her think that she was being used as a propaganda tool and expected to write what she is told. I don't think she would go along with that idea at all. On the other hand, she is searching for both more information and more understanding of the problem of the Soviet intellectual and is consequently subject to influence."

It is certainly clear that the CIA intended to make full use of Priscilla Johnson's talents as a Soviet researcher and writer in an ongoing attempt to destabilize conditions in the Soviet Union , apparently without her complete knowledge.

The next document, dated February 5, 1964, and numbered 17458 (suggesting that there might be a document still classified in between), is a lengthy memo based on a meeting with Priscilla on Jan. 30 and 31,1964, this time written by Gary Coit (SR/CA). Although the report was prepared two months after the assassination of JFK, there is no mention of the subject, including Priscilla's revised report of Nov. 24, 1963 about having interviewed Lee Harvey Oswald. However, in the initial four line paragraph, two full lines and a partial line have been blacked out.

Intriguingly, there is a reference to Priscilla having written to "...her former boss, President Kennedy..." in regard to the fact that her notebooks had not been returned to her by the Soviet Union; they had been removed from her luggage as she was leaving Leningrad (Priscilla pointed out that none of the material was "...particularly sensitive ... and would not have really seriously compromised any of her contacts in the USSR.") Presumably, Coit's reference to JFK as Priscilla's "boss" dates back to the mid-1950s when he was a senator. Nevertheless, she was able to obtain the President's assistance, as press secretary Pierre Salinger had made contact with the Soviet Ambassador about her notebooks, "...which produced no result."

The overall purpose of the Jan. 30-31 meetings (which lasted a total of 11 hours) was to "...debrief Johnson on her flaps with the Soviets when she was in the USSR , notably at the time of her last exit." Much of the memo deals with some of the problems Priscilla encountered with Soviet officials related to her visa and attempts to have it extended. She was able to meet with a Soviet lawyer and, later, his boss in the Foreign Office, and was asked to prepare "...a complete curriculum vitae on herself" - which Priscilla refused to produce. She was also asked about certain issues such as NATO and Soviet-American trade, and "...whether or not she would be interested in writing articles for Soviet publications."

An attempt was made during the debriefing to learn about Priscilla's "contacts" while in the USSR , but she was unwilling to provide names (one of her contacts had been exiled for a year); therefore "...no effort was made to attempt to force the issue of a debriefing on her contacts." However, Coit indicated during the interview that he would "...probably be back to see her from time to time to see what she knows about specific persons whose names might come up, and she at least nodded assent to this."

Reference was made to a reporter/translator named Victor Louis associated with both McGraw-Hill and NANA, whom Priscilla felt had a "...lousy reputation in Moscow ;" she attempted unsuccessfully to get NANA to "drop Louis." She also encouraged NANA to hire "...Ruth Danilov, the wife of another correspondent" (possibly Victor Danilov, author of Rural Russia: Under the New Regime (Univ. of Indiana Press, 1988), but more likely Nicholas Daniloff, a Newsweek correspondent who wrote Two Lives: One Russia (Avon Publishing, 1990) - Coit might have misspelled Ruth's last name.) However, the Soviets refused to accredit her. Priscilla pointed out that NANA subsequently hired "Dick Steiger" who was immediately accredited, due to his "left wing past." Brief reference was also made to Frieda Lurye, a liberal Russian who had spoken at Harvard, as well as Yelena Romanova, whom Priscilla "thoroughly dislikes and thinks ought to be discredited."

Priscilla raised the question during the interview of the likelihood of being able to return to the Soviet Union as a "correspondent." Coit felt it depended on whether the Soviets believed she could be "...useful for some of their plans." Coit felt that her chances were good, since she had not been in any "...serious trouble or done anything especially bad." However, to the best of my knowledge, Priscilla never again returned to the USSR .

Coit had brought up the name "Alex Dolberg" during the debriefing, whom Priscilla knew and talked to at length when he was "...at Harvard." The CIA were quite certain that he was "...working for Sovs and therefore advised her to be careful in any dealings with him." Priscilla had been equally suspicious, although her discussions with him had "...developed her understanding of the Soviet machine ... and (she) now understands power as used by the Sovs."

In his final paragraph, Coit stated that he was "...vaguely uncomfortable after this long discussion with Johnson...", even though he found her to be "...intelligent and well informed on the Soviet Union" (although with "...an air of naivety and innocence, which is really only a mannerism"). Coit felt that Johnson's interest in the Soviet Union was "...an intellectual thing," and that she was "...not out to destroy the Communist system" (the major goal of the CIA). Having spoken to another U.S. correspondent named Patricia Blake (who later wrote a glowing review of Marina and Lee for Time magazine), Coit had noted two "...apparent contradictions" related to Priscilla:

1) she had defended Dolberg to Blake, who for years she had thought was "...no good;" and

2) according to Blake, Miss Johnson had developed a "...low opinion of Lurye after the Boston press conference," in contrast to comments made by Priscilla during the debriefing.

In conclusion, Coit felt that "...we cannot expect to use Johnson actively in operations. She obviously doesn't want to get involved in deep plots. She is unlikely to be the type of informant who will volunteer information; but she will supply info she has acquired, if asked and if it's not too sensitive, such as the identies (sic) of her friends in the USSR."

There is no indication whether the CIA encouraged Priscilla to contact Marina Oswald through its publishing connections, or whether she provided any feedback based on her extensive interviews later that year, but such information could very well be included in another, still classified document.

The third document that I received, dated February 23, 1965, is also a memo written by Gary Coit, based on a phone call from Priscilla in regard to Alex Dolberg. By now Dolberg was living "...in London's demi-monde with homosexuals, drunks, beatniks, etc." and had become "...terribly paranoid", convinced that he was being "...followed everywhere." Priscilla had heard from several sources that Dolberg might be considering going back to the USSR because of the death of his mother and the condition of his father. Coit indicated that Priscilla had reported this information because of her belief that Dolberg "...could do more harm to followers of Soviet intellectual affairs, both in the West and in the USSR, than anyone else she can think of." They both agreed that "someone" should have a talk with Dolberg, and encourage him to recognize the fact that returning to the USSR would be a mistake. At the same time, Coit felt it was important to emphasize to Dolberg that no one trusted him in the West, believing he was a "...Soviet agent," but if he told the CIA everything he knew, he could be "...rehabilitated" and have his name cleared.

Based on the fact that Priscilla had made the call to the CIA, regardless of her motivation, it would appear that she had become an informer for the Agency, although it is impossible to know how much other information she provided, and whether any of it related to her contact with Marina Oswald.

It should be noted that the CIA's interest in Priscilla Johnson began at an early date, based on the fact that a "201 file" was opened most likely in the mid-1950s(2) and, according to a fourth document declassified in 1993 entitled, "Review of 201 File on U.S. Citizen," Priscilla's file had not been closed as of Jan. 28, 1975. She was listed as a "witting collaborator," although the nature of her collaboration was not described.(3)

In addition to the four documents described above, I also received a copy of Priscilla's HSCA Executive Session interview that took place on April 20,1978, although 40 out of 113 pages of transcript have been withdrawn by the CIA. It was clear that the committee members did not entirely trust her.

Peter Whitmey, September, 1994

Read subsequent Letters to the Editor


Notes

1. Thanks to Jon Meyers at AARC for letting me know about the availability of PJM documents discussed in this report.

2. According to a conversation with Major John Newman earlier this year, no date is listed on "201 files", but PJM's number (102798) precedes both Oswald's and Webster's considerably: He estimates that her file was likely opened around 1955. No date is required on "201 files."

3. I learned from Anthony Summers that Priscilla Johnson claimed in a recent interview (with Summers and his wife, Robbyn), that "...the Johnson in the 1975 document is someone other than herself." (Letter from Summers to Whitmey, dated July 27, 1994). It should be noted that only the last name is given on the CIA document, unlike the other three, but all four are stamped "Approved for Release 1993 CIA Historical Review Program." I got the distinct impression from my conversation with John Newman that the "201" file number on the 1975 document was Priscilla Johnson's.


| Part I | Part II | Part III | Update | PJM & CIA | Letters |


Also by Peter Whitmey...

The Lady in Red
Partial Bibliography of Peter Whitmey
My Brief Correspondence with Aline Mosby

Short Biography

JFK Main Page

 


it appears that Richard Billings was CIA also. according to testimony of Loran Hall to the HSCA.

 

 


The New York Times Admits That Virtually Every Major News Organization Allows The News To Be Censored By Government Officials

By Michael, on July 23rd, 2012

In one of the most shocking articles that the New York Times has ever put out, a New York Times reporter has openly admitted that virtually every major mainstream news organization allows government bureaucrats and campaign officials to censor their stories. For example, almost every major news organization in the country has agreed to submit virtually all quotes from anyone involved in the Obama campaign or the Romney campaign to gatekeepers for “quote approval” before they will be published. If the gatekeeper in the Obama campaign does not want a certain quote to get out, the American people will not see it, and the same thing applies to the Romney campaign. The goal is to keep the campaigns as “on message” as possible and to avoid gaffes at all cost. But this kind of thing is not just happening with political campaigns. According to the New York Times, “quote approval” has become “commonplace throughout Washington”. In other words, if you see a quote in the newspaper from someone in the federal government then it is safe to say that a gatekeeper has almost certainly reviewed that quote and has approved it. This is another sign that “the free and independent media” in this country is a joke. What we get from the mainstream media is a very highly filtered form of propaganda, and that is one reason why Americans are turning away from the mainstream media in droves. People want the truth, and more Americans than ever realize that they are not getting it from the mainstream media.

The following quote comes from the recent article in the New York Times mentioned above and it is absolutely jaw dropping….

The quotations come back redacted, stripped of colorful metaphors, colloquial language and anything even mildly provocative.

They are sent by e-mail from the Obama headquarters in Chicago to reporters who have interviewed campaign officials under one major condition: the press office has veto power over what statements can be quoted and attributed by name.

Most reporters, desperate to pick the brains of the president’s top strategists, grudgingly agree. After the interviews, they review their notes, check their tape recorders and send in the juiciest sound bites for review.

The verdict from the campaign — an operation that prides itself on staying consistently on script — is often no, Barack Obama does not approve this message.

This is an article that everyone needs to read. If you have not read it yet, you can find it right here.

What all of this means is that both the Obama campaign and the Romney campaign essentially have “veto power” over any quotes from those campaigns that we see in the newspapers.

According to the New York Times, virtually every major news organization has agreed to submit their quotes for “quote approval”….

It was difficult to find a news outlet that had not agreed to quote approval, albeit reluctantly. Organizations like Bloomberg, The Washington Post, Vanity Fair, Reuters and The New York Times have all consented to interviews under such terms.

This is absolutely disgusting, and it goes against everything that our media is supposed to stand for.

The following is what Joseph Farah had to say when he learned about this story….

All I can say about these people I once considered “colleagues” is that I am so ashamed of them. I am mortified. They are humiliating themselves and a vital institution for any free society.

It seems the biggest threat to the American tradition of a free and independent press is not government coercion. It’s the willing submission of the press to being handled and managed by government and politicians.

Keep in mind that Joseph Farah has been working in the world of journalism for decades. He is deeply saddened to see what is happening to a profession that he deeply loves.

But he is not the only one.

Just check out what Dan Rather had to say during a speech back in 2009….

“At my age and stage I’ve finally reached the point where I don’t have to kiss up to anybody,” he said. “What a wonderful feeling it is.”

Even so, his talk emphasized what he believes is the erosion of quality journalism, because of the corporatization, politicization, and “trivialization” of news. Those three factors, Rather argued, have fueled the “dumbing down and sleezing up of news” and the decline of “great American journalism.”

Likening media consolidation to that of the banking industry, Rather claimed that “roughly 80 percent” of the media is controlled by no more than six, and possibly as few as four, corporations.

And Dan Rather is right. The control over the media in the United States is more tightly concentrated than ever before.

Back in the early 1980s, approximately 50 corporations essentially had nearly total control of the media in the United States.

Today, just six monolithic media corporations dominate virtually everything you watch, hear and read.

These six gigantic corporations own television networks, publishing houses, movie studios, newspapers, radio stations, music labels and video game companies. Most Americans are absolutely addicted to information and entertainment, and those six massive corporations supply the vast majority of the information and entertainment that Americans take in.

The amount of control that those six corporate giants have is absolutely incredible. For example, the average American watches 153 hours of television a month. If you can beam 153 hours of “programming” into someone’s head each month, that gives you an awesome amount of influence over that person.

The six monolithic corporations mentioned above are Time Warner, Walt Disney, Viacom, Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp., CBS Corporation and NBC Universal.

There are some areas of the media that are not completely dominated by those corporations, but even control over those areas is becoming more highly concentrated than ever.

For example, Clear Channel now owns over 1000 radio stations across the United States. The power that Clear Channel has over the radio industry in America is absolutely staggering.

Even control over the Internet is becoming much more concentrated. Giant corporations such as Facebook, Google, Yahoo and Microsoft are increasingly controlling what we see and hear online.

But it really is the “big six” that dominate most of what we see, hear and read on a daily basis.

In a previous article, I detailed a portion of the vast media holdings of these gigantic corporations….

————————————————–

Today, six colossal media giants tower over all the rest. Much of the information in the chart below comes from mediaowners.com. The chart below reveals only a small fraction of the media outlets that these six behemoths actually own….

Time Warner

Home Box Office (HBO)
Time Inc.
Turner Broadcasting System, Inc.
Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
CW Network (partial ownership)
TMZ
New Line Cinema
Time Warner Cable
Cinemax
Cartoon Network
TBS
TNT
America Online
MapQuest
Moviefone
Castle Rock
Sports Illustrated
Fortune
Marie Claire
People Magazine

Walt Disney

ABC Television Network
Disney Publishing
ESPN Inc.
Disney Channel
SOAPnet
A&E
Lifetime
Buena Vista Home Entertainment
Buena Vista Theatrical Productions
Buena Vista Records
Disney Records
Hollywood Records
Miramax Films
Touchstone Pictures
Walt Disney Pictures
Pixar Animation Studios
Buena Vista Games
Hyperion Books

Viacom

Paramount Pictures
Paramount Home Entertainment
Black Entertainment Television (BET)
Comedy Central
Country Music Television (CMT)
Logo
MTV
MTV Canada
MTV2
Nick Magazine
Nick at Nite
Nick Jr.
Nickelodeon
Noggin
Spike TV
The Movie Channel
TV Land
VH1

News Corporation

Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Fox Television Stations
The New York Post
Fox Searchlight Pictures
Beliefnet
Fox Business Network
Fox Kids Europe
Fox News Channel
Fox Sports Net
Fox Television Network
FX
My Network TV
MySpace
News Limited News
Phoenix InfoNews Channel
Phoenix Movies Channel
Sky PerfecTV
Speed Channel
STAR TV India
STAR TV Taiwan
STAR World
Times Higher Education Supplement Magazine
Times Literary Supplement Magazine
Times of London
20th Century Fox Home Entertainment
20th Century Fox International
20th Century Fox Studios
20th Century Fox Television
BSkyB
DIRECTV
The Wall Street Journal
Fox Broadcasting Company
Fox Interactive Media
FOXTEL
HarperCollins Publishers
The National Geographic Channel
National Rugby League
News Interactive
News Outdoor
Radio Veronica
ReganBooks
Sky Italia
Sky Radio Denmark
Sky Radio Germany
Sky Radio Netherlands
STAR
Zondervan

CBS Corporation

CBS News
CBS Sports
CBS Television Network
CNET
Showtime
TV.com
CBS Radio Inc. (130 stations)
CBS Consumer Products
CBS Outdoor
CW Network (50% ownership)
Infinity Broadcasting
Simon & Schuster (Pocket Books, Scribner)
Westwood One Radio Network

NBC Universal

Bravo
CNBC
NBC News
MSNBC
NBC Sports
NBC Television Network
Oxygen
SciFi Magazine
Syfy (Sci Fi Channel)
Telemundo
USA Network
Weather Channel
Focus Features
NBC Universal Television Distribution
NBC Universal Television Studio
Paxson Communications (partial ownership)
Trio
Universal Parks & Resorts
Universal Pictures
Universal Studio Home Video

———————————————————-

Please keep in mind that the list above is not exhaustive. It only contains a sampling of the companies that those six corporate giants own.

So are you starting to get an idea of how powerful they are?

If you ever wondered why the version of “the news” that you get is so similar no matter where you turn, it is because control of the news is concentrated in just a very few hands.

So who controls the “big six” media corporations?

Would it surprise you to know that the boards of directors of those big media corporations have a tremendous amount of overlap with the boards of directors of large banks, large oil companies and large pharmaceutical companies?

The following is from the Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting website….

Media corporations share members of the board of directors with a variety of other large corporations, including banks, investment companies, oil companies, health care and pharmaceutical companies and technology companies.

You can find a list that shows how these boards of directors overlap and interlock right here.

The giant media corporations are not going to criticize the establishment because they are the establishment.

The messages that these media behemoths pound into our heads are going to be the messages that the establishment wants pounded into our heads.

Anyone that believes that the mainstream media is “independent” and that it does not have “an agenda” is being delusional.

Of course it is also worth mentioning that much of what we get from the mainstream media is also often directly controlled by the federal government.

Former Washington Post reporter Carl Bernstein (of Woodward and Bernstein fame) has discovered that hundreds of American journalists have worked directly for the CIA.

Not that the federal government and the establishment are opposed to one another. The truth is that they very much work together hand in hand. But sometimes the federal government has slightly different priorities than the corporate establishment does.

In any event, the key point to take away from all this is that the news and entertainment that we all enjoy on a daily basis if very highly censored and very highly controlled.

It is imperative that we understand that those that own and control the media are trying to shape society in a certain way. They want to impose their values and their vision of the future on all the rest of us.

You will notice that none of the major news organizations speak out against the “Big Brother” police state control grid that is going in all around us.

Instead, they insist that all of this added “security” will keep us safe even as our liberties and freedoms are being badly eroded.

You will notice that none of the major news organizations speak out against the population control agenda of the global elite.

Instead, they insist that more “family planning” will help the environment and make the world a more prosperous place for all of us.

You will notice that none of the major news organizations speak out against the Federal Reserve and none of them are warning us about the financial collapse that is rapidly approaching.

Instead, they tell us to keep having faith in the system and they promise us that everything is going to be okay.

Well, you can mindlessly believe the corporate media if you want, but I believe that in this day and age it is absolutely imperative that we all learn to think for ourselves.

Don’t be a mindless robot for anyone.

Think for yourself and make your own decisions.

The truth is out there and you can find it if you are willing to go search for it.

 


I dug this up at the NYT site. It was their first article after the
assasination, assembled by Tom Wicker from many sources. The interesting
thing is that every statement concerning the time the limousine was on
Elm St. comports *exactly* with the lone gunman in the TSBD viewpoint.
There isn't a single mention of the grassy knoll by Wicker or witnesses.
The number, rhythm and direction of the shots are described with
complete confidence, and the description is in complete accordance with
the views of non-conspiracists.

November 23, 1963


Kennedy Is Killed By Sniper
As He Rides In Car In Dallas;
Johnson Sworn In On Plane

By TOM WICKER

Dallas, Nov. 22--President John Fitzgerald Kennedy was
shot and killed by an assassin today.

He died of a wound in the brain caused by a rifle bullet that was
fired at him as he was riding through downtown Dallas in a
motorcade.

Vice President Lyndon Baines Johnson, who was riding in the third
car behind Mr. Kennedy's, was sworn in as the 36th President of
the United States 99 minutes after Mr. Kennedy's death.

Mr. Johnson is 55 years old; Mr. Kennedy was 46.

Shortly after the assassination, Lee H. Oswald, who once defected
to the Soviet Union and who has been active in the Fair Play for
Cuba Committee, was arrested by the Dallas police. Tonight he
was accused of the killing.

Suspect Captured After Scuffle

Oswald, 24 years old, was also accused of slaying a policeman
who had approached him in the street. Oswald was subdued after
a scuffle with a second policeman in a nearby theater.

President Kennedy was shot at 12:30 P.M., Central standard time
(1:30 P.M., New York time). He was pronounced dead at 1 P.M.
and Mr. Johnson was sworn in at 2:39 P.M.

Mr. Johnson, who was uninjured in the shooting, took his oath in
the Presidential jet plane as it stood on the runway at Love Field.
The body of Mr. Kennedy was aboard. Immediately after the
oath-taking, the plane took off for Washington.

Standing beside the new President as Mr. Johnson took the oath of
office was Mrs. John F. Kennedy. Her stockings were spattered
with her husband's blood.

Gov. John B. Connally Jr. of Texas, who was riding in the same
car with Mr. Kennedy; was severely wounded in the chest, ribs
and arm. His condition was serious, but not critical.

The killer fired the rifle from a building just off the motorcade route.
Mr. Kennedy, Governor Connally and Mr. Johnson had just
received an enthusiastic welcome from a large crowd in downtown
Dallas.

Mr. Kennedy apparently was hit by the first of what witnesses
believed were three shots. He was driven at high speed to Dallas's
Parkland Hospital. There, in an emergency operating room, with
only physicians and nurses in attendance, he died without
regaining consciousness.

Mrs. Kennedy, Mrs. Connally and a Secret Service agent were in
the car with Mrs. Kennedy and Governor Connally. Two Secret
Service agents flanked the car. Other than Mr. Connally, none of
this group was injured in the shooting. Mrs. Kennedy cried, "Oh
no" immediately after her husband was struck.

Mrs. Kennedy was in the hospital near her husband when he died,
but not in the operating room. When the body was taken from the
hospital in a bronze coffin about 2 P.M., Mrs. Kennedy walked
beside it.

Her face was sorrowful. She looked steadily at the floor. She still
wore the raspberry- colored suit in which she had greeted
welcoming crowds in Forth Worth and Dallas. But she had taken
off the matching pillbox hat she wore earlier in the day, and her
dark hair was windblown and tangled. Her hand rested lightly on
her husband's coffin as it was taken to a waiting hearse.

Mrs. Kennedy climbed in beside the coffin. Then the ambulance
drove to Love Field, and Mr. Kennedy's body was placed aboard
the Presidential jet. Mrs. Kennedy then attended the swearing-in
ceremony for Mr. Johnson.

As Mr. Kennedy's body left Parkland Hospital, a few stunned
persons stood outside. Nurses and doctors, whispering among
themselves, looked from the window. A large crowd that had
gathered earlier, before it was known that the President was dead,
had been dispersed by Secret Service men and policemen.

Priests Administer Last Rites

Two priests administered last rites to Mr. Kennedy, a Roman
Catholic. They were the Very Rev. Oscar Huber, the pastor of Holy
Trinity Church in Dallas, and the Rev. James Thompson.

Mr. Johnson was sworn in as President by Federal Judge Sarah T.
Hughes of the Northern District of Texas. She was appointed to the
judgeship by Mr. Kennedy in October, 1961.

The ceremony, delayed about five minutes for Mrs. Kennedy's
arrival, took place in the private Presidential cabin in the rear of the
plane.

About 25 to 30 persons--members of the late President's staff,
members of Congress who had been accompanying the President
on a two-day tour of Texas cities and a few reporters--crowed into
the little room.

No accurate listing of those present could be obtained. Mrs.
Kennedy stood at the left of Mr. Johnson, her eyes and face
showing the signs of weeping that had apparently shaken her
since she left the hospital not long before.

Mrs. Johnson, wearing a beige dress, stood at her husband's right.

As Judge Hughes read the brief oath of office, her eyes, too, were
red from weeping. Mr. Johnson's hands rested on a black,
leather-bound Bible as Judge Hughes read and he repeated:

"I do solemnly swear that I will perform the duties of the President
of the United States to the best of my ability and defend, protect
and preserve the Constitution of the United States."

Those 34 words made Lyndon Baines Johnson, one-time farmboy
and schoolteacher of Johnson City, the President.

Johnson Embraces Mrs. Kennedy

Mr. Johnson made no statement. He embraced Mrs. Kennedy and
she held his hand for a long moment. He also embraced Mrs.
Johnson and Mrs. Evelyn Lincoln, Mr. Kennedy's private
secretary.

"O.K." Mr. Johnson said. "Lets get this plane back to Washington."

At 2:46 P.M., seven minutes after he had become President, 106
minutes after Mr. Kennedy had become the fourth American
President to succumb to an assassin's wounds, the white and red
jet took off for Washington.

In the cabin when Mr. Johnson took the oath was Cecil Stoughton,
an armed forces photographer assigned to the White House.

Mr. Kennedy's staff members appeared stunned and bewildered.
Lawrence F. O'Brien, the Congressional liaison officer, and P.
Kenneth O'Donnell, the appointment secretary, both long
associates of Mr. Kennedy, showed evidences of weeping. None
had anything to say.

Other staff members believed to be in the cabin for the swearing-in
included David F. Powers, the White House receptionist; Miss
Pamela Turnure, Mrs. Kennedy's press secretary, and Malcolm
Kilduff, the assistant White House press secretary.

Mr. Kilduff announced the President's death, with choked voice and
red-rimmed eyes at about 1:36 P.M.

President John F. Kennedy died at approximately 1 o' clock
Central standard time today here in Dallas," Mr. Kilduff said at the
hospital. "He died of a gunshot wound in the brain, I have no other
details regarding the assassination of the President."

Mr. Kilduff also announced that Governor Connally had been hit by
a bullet or bullets and that Mr. Johnson, who had not yet been
sworn in, was safe in the protective custody of the Secret Service
at an unannounced place, presumably the airplane at Love Field.

Mr. Kilduff indicated that the President had been shot once. Later
medical reports raised the possibility that there had been two
wounds. But the death was caused, as far as could be learned, by
a massive wound in the brain.

Later in the afternoon, Dr. Malcolm Perry, an attending surgeon,
and Dr. Kemp Clark, chief of neurosurgery at Parkland Hospital,
gave more details.

Mr. Kennedy was hit by a bullet in the throat, just below the
Adam's apple, they said. This wound had the appearance of the
bullets' entry.

Mr. Kennedy also had a massive, gaping wound in the back and
one on the right side of the head. However, the doctors said it was
impossible to determine immediately whether the wounds had
been caused by one bullet or two.

Resuscitation Attempted

Dr. Perry, the first physician to treat the President, said a number
of resuscitative measure had been attempted, including oxygen,
anesthesia, an indotracheal tube, a tracheotomy blood and fluids.
An eloctrocardiogram monitor was attached to measure MR.
Kennedy's heart beats.

Dr. Clark was summoned and arrived in a minute or two. By then,
Dr. Perry said, Mr. Kennedy was "critically ill and moribund," or
near death.

Dr. Clark said that on his first sight of the President he had
concluded immediately that Mr. Kennedy could not live.

"It was apparent that the President had sustained a lethal wound,"
he said. "A missile had gone in and out of the back of his head
causing external lacerations and loss of brain tissue."

Shortly after he arrived, Dr. Clark said, "the President lost his heart
action by the electrocardiogram." A closed-chest cardiograph
massage was attempted, as were other emergency resuscitation
measure.

Dr. Clark said these had produced "palpable pulses" for a short
time, but all were "to no avail."

In Operating Room 40 Minutes

The President was on the emergency table at the hospital for
about 40 minutes, the doctors said. At the end, perhaps eight
physicians were in Operating Room No. 1, where Mr. Kennedy
remained until his death. Dr. Clark said it was difficult to determine
the exact moment of death, but the doctors said officially that it
occurred at 1 P.M.

Later, there were unofficial reports that Mr. Kennedy had been
killed instantly. The source of these reports, Dr. Tom Shires, chief
surgeon a the hospital and professor of surgery at he University of
Texas Southwest Medical School, issued this statement tonight:

"Medically, it was apparent the President was not alive when he
was brought in. There was no spontaneous respiration. He had
dilated, fixed pupils. It was obvious he had a lethal head wound.

"Technically, however, by using vigorous resuscitation, intravenous
tubes and all the usual supportive measure, we were able to raise
a semblance of a heartbeat."

Dr. Shires said he was "positive it was impossible" that President
Kennedy could have spoken after being shot. "I am absolutely
sure he never knew what hit him," Dr. Shires said.

Dr. Shires was not present when Mr. Kennedy was being treated
at Parkland Hospital. He issued his statement, however, after
lengthy conferences with the doctors who had attended the
President.

Mr. Johnson remained in the hospital about 30 minutes after Mr.
Kennedy died.

The details of what happened when shots first rang out, as the
President's car moved along at about 25 miles an hour, were
sketchy. Secret Service agents, who might have given more
details, were unavailable to the press at first, and then returned to
Washington with President Johnson.

Kennedys Hailed at Breakfast

Mr. Kennedy had opened his day in Fort Worth, first with a speech
in a parking lot and then at a Chamber of Commerce breakfast.
The breakfast appearance was a particular triumph for Mrs.
Kennedy, who entered late and was given an ovation.

Then the Presidential party, including Governor and Mrs. Connally,
flew on to Dallas, an eight-minute flight. Mr. Johnson, as is
customary, flew in a separate plane. The Presidents and the Vice
President do not travel together out of fear of a double tragedy.

At Love Field, Mr. and Mrs. Kennedy lingered for 10 minutes,
shaking hands with an enthusiastic group lining the fence. The
group called itself "Grassroots Democrats."

Mr. Kennedy then entered his open Lincoln convertible at the head
of the motorcade. He sat in the rear seat on the right-hand side.
Mrs. Kennedy, who appeared to be enjoying one of the first
political outings she had ever made with her husband, sat at his
left.

In the "jump" seat, directly ahead of Mr. Kennedy, sat Governor
Connally, with Mrs. Connally at his left in another "jump" seat. A
Secret Service agent was driving and the two others ran alongside.

Behind the President's limousine was an open sedan carrying a
number of Secret Service agents. Behind them, in an open
convertible, rode Mr. and Mrs. Johnson and Texas's senior
Senator, Ralph W. Yarborough, a Democrat.

The motorcade proceeded uneventfully along a 10-mile route
through downtown Dallas, aiming for the Merchandise Mart. Mr.
Kennedy was to address a group of the city's leading citizens at a
luncheon in his honor.

In downtown Dallas, crowds were thick, enthusiastic and cheering.
The turnout was somewhat unusual for this center of
conservatism, where only a month ago Adlai E. Stevenson was
attacked by a rightist crowd. It was also in Dallas, during the 1960
campaign, that Senator Lyndon B. Johnson and his wife were
nearly mobbed in the lobby of the Baker Hotel.

As the motorcade neared its end and the President's car moved
out of the thick crowds onto Stennonds Freeway near the
Merchandise Mart, Mrs. Connally recalled later, "we were all very
pleased with the reception in downtown Dallas."

Approaching 3-Street Underpass

Behind the three leading cars were a string of others carrying
Texas and Dallas dignitaries, two buses of reporters, several open
cars carrying photographers and other reporters, and a bus for
White House staff members.

As Mrs. Connally recalled later, the President's car was almost
ready to go underneath a "triple underpass" beneath three
streets--Elm, Commerce and Main--when the first shot was fired.

That shot apparently struck Mr. Kennedy. Governor Connally
turned in his seat at the sound and appeared immediately to be hit
in the chest.

Mrs. Mary Norman of Dallas was standing at the curb and at that
moment was aiming her camera at the President. She saw him
slump forward, then slide down in the seat.

"My God," Mrs. Norman screamed, as she recalled it later, "he's
shot!"

Mrs. Connally said that Mrs. Kennedy had reached and "grabbed"
her husband. Mrs. Connally put her arms around the Governor.
Mrs. Connally said that she and Mrs. Kennedy had then ducked
low in the car as it sped off.

Mrs. Connally's recollections were reported by Julian Reade, an
aide to the Governor.

Most reporters in the press buses were too far back to see the
shooting, but they observed some quick scurrying by motor
policemen accompanying the motorcade. It was noted that the
President's car had picked up speed and raced away, but reports
were not aware that anything serious had occurred until they
reached the Merchandise Mart two or three minutes later.

Rumors Spread at Trade Mart

Rumors of the shooting already were spreading through the
luncheon crowd of hundreds, which was having the first course.
No White House officials or Secret Service agents were present,
but the reporters were taken quickly to Parkland Hospital on the
strength of the rumors.

There they encountered Senator Yarborough, white, shaken and
horrified.

The shots, he said, seemed to have come from the right and the
rear of the car in which he was riding, the third in the motorcade.
Another eyewitness, Mel Crouch, a Dallas television reported,
reported that as the shots rang out he saw a rifle extended and
then withdrawn from a window on the "fifth or sixth floor" of the
Texas Public School Book Depository. This is a leased state
building on Elm Street, to the right of the motorcade route.

Senator Yarborough said there had been a slight pause between
the first two shots and a longer pause between the second and
third. A Secret Service man riding in the Senator's car, the Senator
said, immediately ordered Mr. and Mrs. Johnson to get down below
the level of the doors. They did so, and Senator Yarborough also
got down.

The leading cars of the motorcade then pulled away at high speed
toward Parkland Hospital, which was not far away, by the fast
highway.

"We knew by the speed that something was terribly wrong,"
Senator Yarborough reported. When he put his head up, he said,
he saw a Secret Service man in the car ahead beating his fists
against the trunk deck of the car in which he was riding apparently
in frustration and anguish.

Mrs. Kennedy's Reaction

Only White House staff members spoke with Mrs. Kennedy. A
Dallas medical student, David Edwards, saw her in Parkland
Hospital while she was waiting for new of her husband. He gave
this description:

"The look in her eyes was like an animal that had been trapped, like
a little rabbit--brave, but fear was in the eyes."

Dr. Clark was reported to have informed Mrs. Kennedy of her
husband's death.

No witnesses reported seeing or hearing any of the Secret Service
agents or policemen fire back. One agent was seen to brandish a
machine gun as the cars sped away. Mr. Crouch observed a
policeman falling to the ground and pulling a weapon. But the
events had occurred so quickly that there was apparently noting for
the men to shoot at.

Mr. Crouch said he saw two women, standing at a curb to watch
the motorcade pass, fall to the ground when the shots rang out. He
also saw a man snatch up his little girl and run along the road.
Policemen, he said, immediately chased this man under the
impression he had been involved in the shooting, but Mr. Crouch
said he had been a fleeing spectator.

Mr. Kennedy's limousine--license No. GG300 under District of
Columbia registry--pulled up at the emergency entrance of
Parkland Hospital. Senator Yarborough said the President had
been carried inside on a stretcher.

By the time reporters arrived at the hospital, the police were
guarding the Presidential car closely. They would allow no one to
approach it. A bucket of water stood by the car, suggesting that the
back seat had been scrubbed out.

Robert Clark of the American Broadcasting Company, who had
been riding near the front of the motorcade, said Mr. Kennedy was
motionless when he was carried inside. There as a great amount
of blood on Mr. Kennedy's suit and shirtfront and the front of his
body, Mr. Clark said.

Mrs. Kennedy was leaning over her husband when the car
stopped, Mr. Clark said, and walked beside the wheeled stretcher
into the hospital. Mr. Connally sat with his hands holding his
stomach, his head bent over. He, too, was moved into the hospital
in a stretcher, with Mrs. Connally at his side.

Robert McNeill of the National Broadcasting Company, who also
was in the reporters' pool car, jumped out at the scene of the
shooting. He said the police had taken two eyewitnesses into
custody--an 8-year-old Negro boy and a white man--for
informational purposes.

Many of these reports could not be verified immediately.

Eyewitness Describes Shooting

An unidentified Dallas man, interviewed on television here, said he
had been waving at the President when the shots were fired. His
belief was that Mr. Kennedy had been struck twice--once, as Mrs.
Norman recalled, when he slumped in his seat; again when he slid
down in it.

"It seemed to just knock him down," the man said.

Governor Connally's condition was reported as "satisfactory"
tonight after four hours in surgery at Parkland Hospital.

Dr. Robert R. Shaw a thoracic surgeon, operated on the Governor
to repair damage to his left chest.

Later, Dr. Shaw said Governor Connally had been hit in the back
just below the shoulder blade, and that the bullet had gone
completely through the Governor's chest, taking out part of the fifth
rib.

After leaving the body, he said, the bullet struck the Governor's
right wrist, causing a compound fracture. It then lodged in the left
thigh.

The thigh wound, Dr. Shaw said, was trivial. He said the
compound fracture would heal.

Dr. Shaw said it would be unwise for Governor Connally to be
moved in the next 10 to 14 days. Mrs. Connally was remaining at
his side tonight.

Tour by Mrs. Kennedy Unusual

Mrs. Kennedy's presence near her husband's bedside at his
death resulted from somewhat unusual circumstances. She had
rarely accompanied him on his trips about the country and had
almost never made political trips with him.

The tour on which Mr. Kennedy was engaged yesterday and today
was only quasi- political; the only open political activity was to have
been a speech tonight to a fund- raising dinner at the state capitol
in Austin.

In visiting Texas, Mr. Kennedy was seeking to improve his political
fortunes in a pivotal state that he barely won in 1960. He was also
hoping to patch a bitter internal dispute among Texas's
Democrats.

At 8: 45 A.M., when Mr. Kennedy left the Texas Hotel in Fort
Worth, where he spent his last night, to address, the parking lot
crowd across the street, Mrs. Kennedy was not with him. There
appeared to be some disappointment.

"Mrs. Kennedy is organizing herself," the President said
good-naturedly. "It takes longer, but, of course, she looks better
than we do when she does it."

Later, Mrs. Kennedy appeared late at the Chamber of Commerce
breakfast in Fort Worth.

Again, Mr. Kennedy took note of her presence. "Two years ago,"
he said "I introduced myself in Paris by saying that I was the man
who had accompanied Mrs. Kennedy to Paris. I am getting
somewhat that same sensation as I travel around Texas. Nobody
wonders what Lyndon and I wear."

The speech Mr. Kennedy never delivered at the Merchandise Mart
luncheon contained a passage commenting on a recent
preoccupation of his, and a subject of much interest in this city,
where right-wing conservatism is the rule rather than the
exception.

Voices are being herd in the land, he said, "voices preaching
doctrines wholly unrelated to reality, wholly unsuited to the sixties,
doctrines which apparently assume that words will suffice without
weapons, that vituperation is as good as victory and that peace is
a sign of weakness."

The speech went on: At a time when the national debt is steadily
being reduced in terms of its burden on our economy, they see
that debt as the greatest threat to our security. At a time when we
are steadily reducing the number of Federal employes serving
every thousand citizens, they fear those supposed hordes of civil
servants far more than the actual hordes of opposing armies.

"We cannot expect that everyone, to use the phrase of a decade
ago, will 'talk sense to the American people.' But we can hope that
fewer people will listen to nonsense. And the notion that this nation
is headed for defeat through deficit, or that strength is but a matter
of slogans, is nothing but just plain nonsense."

--
 


 

The New York Times Admits That Virtually Every Major News Organization Allows The News To Be Censored By Government Officials

By Michael, on July 23rd, 2012

In one of the most shocking articles that the New York Times has ever put out, a New York Times reporter has openly admitted that virtually every major mainstream news organization allows government bureaucrats and campaign officials to censor their stories. For example, almost every major news organization in the country has agreed to submit virtually all quotes from anyone involved in the Obama campaign or the Romney campaign to gatekeepers for “quote approval” before they will be published. If the gatekeeper in the Obama campaign does not want a certain quote to get out, the American people will not see it, and the same thing applies to the Romney campaign. The goal is to keep the campaigns as “on message” as possible and to avoid gaffes at all cost. But this kind of thing is not just happening with political campaigns. According to the New York Times, “quote approval” has become “commonplace throughout Washington”. In other words, if you see a quote in the newspaper from someone in the federal government then it is safe to say that a gatekeeper has almost certainly reviewed that quote and has approved it. This is another sign that “the free and independent media” in this country is a joke. What we get from the mainstream media is a very highly filtered form of propaganda, and that is one reason why Americans are turning away from the mainstream media in droves. People want the truth, and more Americans than ever realize that they are not getting it from the mainstream media.

The following quote comes from the recent article in the New York Times mentioned above and it is absolutely jaw dropping….

The quotations come back redacted, stripped of colorful metaphors, colloquial language and anything even mildly provocative.

They are sent by e-mail from the Obama headquarters in Chicago to reporters who have interviewed campaign officials under one major condition: the press office has veto power over what statements can be quoted and attributed by name.

Most reporters, desperate to pick the brains of the president’s top strategists, grudgingly agree. After the interviews, they review their notes, check their tape recorders and send in the juiciest sound bites for review.

The verdict from the campaign — an operation that prides itself on staying consistently on script — is often no, Barack Obama does not approve this message.

This is an article that everyone needs to read. If you have not read it yet, you can find it right here.

What all of this means is that both the Obama campaign and the Romney campaign essentially have “veto power” over any quotes from those campaigns that we see in the newspapers.

According to the New York Times, virtually every major news organization has agreed to submit their quotes for “quote approval”….

It was difficult to find a news outlet that had not agreed to quote approval, albeit reluctantly. Organizations like Bloomberg, The Washington Post, Vanity Fair, Reuters and The New York Times have all consented to interviews under such terms.

This is absolutely disgusting, and it goes against everything that our media is supposed to stand for.

The following is what Joseph Farah had to say when he learned about this story….

All I can say about these people I once considered “colleagues” is that I am so ashamed of them. I am mortified. They are humiliating themselves and a vital institution for any free society.

It seems the biggest threat to the American tradition of a free and independent press is not government coercion. It’s the willing submission of the press to being handled and managed by government and politicians.

Keep in mind that Joseph Farah has been working in the world of journalism for decades. He is deeply saddened to see what is happening to a profession that he deeply loves.

But he is not the only one.

Just check out what Dan Rather had to say during a speech back in 2009….

“At my age and stage I’ve finally reached the point where I don’t have to kiss up to anybody,” he said. “What a wonderful feeling it is.”

Even so, his talk emphasized what he believes is the erosion of quality journalism, because of the corporatization, politicization, and “trivialization” of news. Those three factors, Rather argued, have fueled the “dumbing down and sleezing up of news” and the decline of “great American journalism.”

Likening media consolidation to that of the banking industry, Rather claimed that “roughly 80 percent” of the media is controlled by no more than six, and possibly as few as four, corporations.

And Dan Rather is right. The control over the media in the United States is more tightly concentrated than ever before.

Back in the early 1980s, approximately 50 corporations essentially had nearly total control of the media in the United States.

Today, just six monolithic media corporations dominate virtually everything you watch, hear and read.

These six gigantic corporations own television networks, publishing houses, movie studios, newspapers, radio stations, music labels and video game companies. Most Americans are absolutely addicted to information and entertainment, and those six massive corporations supply the vast majority of the information and entertainment that Americans take in.

The amount of control that those six corporate giants have is absolutely incredible. For example, the average American watches 153 hours of television a month. If you can beam 153 hours of “programming” into someone’s head each month, that gives you an awesome amount of influence over that person.

The six monolithic corporations mentioned above are Time Warner, Walt Disney, Viacom, Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp., CBS Corporation and NBC Universal.

There are some areas of the media that are not completely dominated by those corporations, but even control over those areas is becoming more highly concentrated than ever.

For example, Clear Channel now owns over 1000 radio stations across the United States. The power that Clear Channel has over the radio industry in America is absolutely staggering.

Even control over the Internet is becoming much more concentrated. Giant corporations such as Facebook, Google, Yahoo and Microsoft are increasingly controlling what we see and hear online.

But it really is the “big six” that dominate most of what we see, hear and read on a daily basis.

In a previous article, I detailed a portion of the vast media holdings of these gigantic corporations….


 

 

 

 

Conspiracy TheoriesFor TeachersOverwhelmed?

Subscribe Free

Best Information

Recent News Posts

Concise Summaries

Hidden Knowledge

News Article Index

Key Media Articles

Top Resources

A Brighter Future

Online Courses

Reader Reviews

What You Can Do

About Us

Please Donate

$

Donate

 

 

 

Gadgets powered by Google

 

Best Free Videos


Most Revealing Videos

10 Best Truth Videos


PBS Documentary

Secret Government


BBC Documentary

Power of Nightmares


History Channel

Mind Control


Discovery Channel

Conspiracy of Silence


HBO Documentary

Hacking Democracy


9/11 Documentary

9/11: Press for Truth

Inspiration

Fluid Intelligence

Our Great Hope

Find Life Purpose

Transform Fear

Victim or Creator?

End Poverty

Moment of Love

Simple Keys to Life

Near-Death Awakening

10 Reasons for Hope

Insider Reveals All

Shifting Paradigms

Principles of
Transformation

Information Centers

Online Courses

9/11

Banking

Elections

Energy

Health

Inspiration

Mass Media

Mind Control

Miscellaneous

UFO Cover-up

War Cover-up

Email Messages

News Archive

Even Deeper

Overwhelmed?

 

 

Bookmark and Share

News Articles

Excerpts of Key News Articles in Major Media

 


Below are highly revealing excerpts of key news articles from the mainstream media suggesting major cover-ups. Links are provided to the full articles on their major media websites. If any link fails to function, click here. These news articles are listed by order of importance. For the same list by date posted, click here. For the list by date of news article, click here. For headlines and links only to key news articles, click here. By choosing to educate ourselves and to spread the word, we can and will build a brighter future.


 

 


Note: For an index to revealing excerpts of news articles on several dozen engaging topics, click here.

U.S. Military Wanted to Provoke War With Cuba
2001-05-01, ABC News
http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662

In the early 1960s, America's top military leaders reportedly drafted plans to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Cuba. Code named Operation Northwoods, the plans reportedly included the possible assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S. ship, and even orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities. The plans were developed as ways to trick the American public and the international community into supporting a war to oust Cuba's ... Fidel Castro. America's top military brass even contemplated causing U.S. military casualties, writing: "We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba," and, "casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation." The plans had the written approval of all of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and were presented to President Kennedy's defense secretary, Robert McNamara, in March 1962. But they apparently were rejected by the civilian leadership and have gone undisclosed for nearly 40 years. The Joint Chiefs even proposed using the potential death of astronaut John Glenn during the first attempt to put an American into orbit as a false pretext for war with Cuba. Should the rocket explode and kill Glenn, they wrote, "the objective is to provide irrevocable proof … that the fault lies with the Communists." The scary thing is none of this stuff comes out until 40 years after.

Note: Why was ABC the only major news source to report on this highly revealing story? To read the shocking declassified documents on Operation Northwoods, click here. Many military and political leaders look at the world as a chess board. Sacrificing pawns (innocent civilians) is sometimes necessary to capture the queen. For other revealing news articles on military corruption, click here. For revealing 9/11 news articles, click here.

 


 

US plans to fight the net revealed
2006-01-27, BBC News
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4655196.stm

A newly declassified document gives a fascinating glimpse into the US military's plans for "information operations". The declassified document is called "Information Operations Roadmap". It was obtained by the National Security Archive at George Washington University using the Freedom of Information Act. Officials in the Pentagon wrote it in 2003. The Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, signed it. The operations described in the document include a surprising range of military activities: public affairs officers who brief journalists, psychological operations troops who try to manipulate the thoughts and beliefs of an enemy, computer network attack specialists who seek to destroy enemy networks. The military's psychological operations, or Psyops, is finding its way onto the computer and television screens of ordinary Americans. "Psyops messages will often be replayed by the news media for much larger audiences, including the American public. Strategy should be based on the premise that the Department [of Defense] will 'fight the net' as it would an enemy weapons system," it reads. The document recommends that the United States should seek the ability to "provide maximum control of the entire electromagnetic spectrum". US forces should be able to "disrupt or destroy the full spectrum of globally emerging communications systems, sensors, and weapons systems dependent on the electromagnetic spectrum". The fact that the "Information Operations Roadmap" is approved by the Secretary of Defense suggests that these plans are taken very seriously indeed in the Pentagon.

Note: For other revealing news articles on military corruption, click here. For other revealing news articles on government corruption, click here.

 


 

Inside the secretive Bilderberg Group
2005-09-29, BBC News
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4290944.stm

How much influence do private networks of the rich and powerful have on government policies and international relations? One group, the Bilderberg, has often attracted speculation that it forms a shadowy global government. Every year since 1954 [they have brought] together about 120 leading business people and politicians. At this year's meeting in Germany, the audience included the heads of the World Bank and European Central Bank, Chairmen or Chief Executives from Nokia, BP, Unilever, DaimlerChrysler and Pepsi ... editors from five major newspapers, members of parliament, ministers, European commissioners ... and the queen of the Netherlands. The chairman ... is 73-year-old Viscount Etienne Davignon. In an extremely rare interview, he played down the importance of Bilderberg. "I don't think (we are) a global ruling class because I don't think a global ruling class exists." Will Hutton ... who attended a Bilderberg meeting in 1997, says people take part in these networks in order to influence the way the world works, to create what he calls "the international common sense". And that "common sense" is one which supports the interests of Bilderberg's main participants. For Bilderberg's critics the fact that there is almost no publicity about the annual meetings is proof that they are up to no good. Bilderberg meetings often feature future political leaders shortly before they become household names. Bill Clinton went in 1991 while still governor of Arkansas, Tony Blair was there two years later while still an opposition MP. All the recent presidents of the European Commission attended Bilderberg meetings before they were appointed. Informal and private networks like Bilderberg have helped to oil the wheels of global politics and globalisation for the past half a century.

Note: Why is this meeting of top world leaders kept so secret? Why, until a few years ago, was there virtually no reporting on this influential group in the major media? Thankfully, the alternative media has had some good articles. And a Google search can be highly informative. For many other revealing news articles from major media sources on powerful secret societies, click here. And for those interested in exploring reliable information covering the big picture of how and why these secret societies are using government-sponsored mind control programs to achieve their agenda, click here.

 


 

The War On Waste
2002-01-29, CBS News
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/01/29/eveningnews/main325985.shtml

On Sept. 10 [2001], Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld declared war. Not on foreign terrorists, "the adversary's closer to home. It's the Pentagon bureaucracy." He said money wasted by the military poses a serious threat. Rumsfeld promised change but the next day—Sept. 11—the world changed and in the rush to fund the war on terrorism, the war on waste seems to have been forgotten. Just last week President Bush announced, "my 2003 budget calls for more than $48 billion in new defense spending." More money for the Pentagon ... while its own auditors admit the military cannot account for 25 percent of what it spends. "According to some estimates we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions," Rumsfeld admitted. $2.3 trillion—that's $8,000 for every man, woman and child in America. A former Marine turned whistle-blower is risking his job by speaking out ... about the millions he noticed were missing from one defense agency's balance sheets. Jim Minnery, Defense Finance and Accounting Service ... tried to follow the money trail, even crisscrossing the country looking for records. "The director looked at me and said 'Why do you care about this stuff?' It took me aback. My supervisor asking me why I care about doing a good job," said Minnery. He was reassigned and says officials then covered up the problem. The Pentagon's Inspector General "partially substantiated" several of Minnery's allegations.

Note: To see the CBS video clip of this shocking admission, click here. For another key clip, click here. For other media articles revealing major corruption, click here. Even though originally not reported because of the trauma of 9/11, why wasn't this news broadcast far and wide later? Why isn't it making media headlines now? For other revealing news articles on military corruption, click here.

 


 

[9/11] Hijack 'suspects' alive and well
2001-09-23, BBC News
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm

Another of the men named by the FBI as a hijacker in the suicide attacks on Washington and New York has turned up alive and well. The identities of four of the 19 suspects accused of having carried out the attacks are now in doubt. Saudi Arabian pilot Waleed Al Shehri was one of five men that the FBI said had deliberately crashed American Airlines flight 11 into the World Trade Centre on 11 September. His photograph was released, and has since appeared in newspapers and on television around the world. He told journalists there that he had nothing to do with the attacks. He has contacted both the Saudi and American authorities. He acknowledges that he attended flight training school at Daytona Beach in the United States, and is indeed the same Waleed Al Shehri to whom the FBI has been referring. But, he says, he left the United States in September last year [and] became a pilot with Saudi Arabian airlines. Abdulaziz Al Omari, another of the Flight 11 hijack suspects ... says he is an engineer with Saudi Telecoms, and that he lost his passport while studying in Denver. Meanwhile ... a London-based Arabic daily says it has interviewed Saeed Alghamdi. He was listed by the FBI as a hijacker in the United flight that crashed in Pennsylvania. And there are suggestions that another suspect, Khalid Al Midhar, may also be alive. FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged on Thursday that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt.

Note: The deceptions in the official story of 9/11 are nowhere more clearly shown than in this important story. The FBI never revised its list of alleged hijackers, and these four are all later listed in the official 9/11 Commission report as the hijackers. Click here and scroll down a little over half way to see their photos in the official report. For more on this, click here. For an abundance of reliable information suggesting a major 9/11 cover-up, click here. For other revealing news articles on 9/11, click here.

 


 

Report of the Select Committee on Assassinations of the U.S. House of Representatives
1979-07-00, United States National Archives
http://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/select-committee-report/summary.html

Findings of the Select Committee on Assassinations in the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas, Tex., November 22, 1963. Scientific acoustical evidence establishes a high probability that two gunmen fired at President John F. Kennedy. Other scientific evidence does not preclude the possibility of two gunmen firing at the President. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. The committee is unable to identify the other gunman or the extent of the conspiracy. The [original] investigation into the possibility of conspiracy in the assassination was inadequate. The conclusions of the investigations were arrived at in good faith, but presented in a fashion that was too definitive. The Department of Justice failed to exercise initiative in supervising and directing the investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation of the assassination. The Federal Bureau of Investigation failed to investigate adequately the possibility of a conspiracy to assassinate the President. The Central Intelligence Agency was deficient in its collection and sharing of information both prior to and subsequent to the assassination. The Warren Commission failed to investigate adequately the possibility of a conspiracy to assassinate the President.

Note: This same US Congressional report, on the subject of the Martin Luther King, Jr. assassination, states that "The committee believes, on the basis of the circumstantial evidence available to it, that there is a likelihood that James Earl Ray assassinated Dr. Martin Luther King as a result of a conspiracy." Why hasn't this information been widely reported and become public knowledge? For a possible answer, click here. For other revealing news articles on assassinations, click here.

 


 

It only takes $26 to hack a voting machine
2011-09-28, MSNBC
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44706301/ns/technology_and_science-security

Researchers from the Argonne National Laboratory in Illinois have developed a hack that, for about $26 and an 8th-grade science education, can remotely manipulate the electronic voting machines used by millions of voters all across the U.S. The researchers ... performed their proof-of-concept hack on a Diebold Accuvote TS electronic voting machine, a type of touchscreen Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) voting system that is widely used for government elections. Diebold's voting-machine business is now owned by the Denver-based Dominion Voting Systems, whose e-voting machines are used in about 22 states. Roger Johnston and Jon Warner from Argonne National Laboratory's Vulnerability Assessment Team demonstrate three different ways an attacker could tamper with, and remotely take full control, of the e-voting machine simply by attaching what they call a piece of "alien electronics" into the machine's circuit board. The electronic hacking tool consists of a $1.29 microprocessor and a circuit board that costs about $8. Together with the $15 remote control, which enabled the researchers to modify votes from up to a half-mile away, the whole hack runs about $26.

Note: Why isn't this making news headlines? For more on this critical development, click here. For many other news articles on serious problems with elections, click here.

 


 

Former U.S. Air Force Officers Recount Experiences With UFOs at Nuclear Missile Bases
2010-10-27, ABC News
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/airmen-govt-clean-ufos/story?id=11738715

The U.S. government's official line may be that unidentified flying objects (UFOs) don't pose a national security threat, but a group of former Air Force officers gathered Monday in the nation's capital to tell a different story. During a press conference at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., seven former Air Force officers once stationed at nuclear bases around the country said that not only have UFOs visited Air Force bases, some have succeeded in disabling nuclear missiles stationed there. "I want the government to acknowledge that this phenomenon exists," said Robert Salas, a former U.S. Air Force Nuclear Launch Officer. Salas said he doesn't think the UFOs he claims to have encountered had any offensive intent, but he believes they wanted to leave an impression. "They wanted to shine a light on our nuclear weapons and just send us a message," he said. "My interpretation is the message is get rid of them because it's going to mean our destruction." Other former officers recounted similar stories of unexplained moving lights and odd-shaped flying objects during their time in the service. Leslie Kean, an investigative journalist and author of the new book "UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Record," said thousands of pages of documentation support the officers' accounts. She spent the last 10 years researching UFOs and combing through thousands of pages of declassified government material. Kean said that one declassified document that she researched for her book, relating to the Salas incident, said, "the fact that no apparent reason for the loss of the 10 missiles can easily be identified is a cause for grave concern to this headquarters."

Note: To watch 18-minutes of this most fascinating testimony on the CNN website, click here. This is not the first time government and military witnesses have testified at the National Press Club about a major cover-up of UFOs. To watch 22 witnesses testifying to remarkable personal stories in May 2001, click here. For a two-page written summary of amazing UFO testimony from top officials, click here. For more fascinating news articles on UFOs, click here.

 


 

How can it be that you pay more to the IRS than General Electric?
2010-04-01, Forbes magazine
http://www.forbes.com/2010/04/01/ge-exxon-walmart-business-washington-corpora...

Some of the world's biggest, most profitable corporations enjoy a far lower tax rate than you do--that is, if they pay taxes at all. The most egregious example is General Electric. Last year the conglomerate generated $10.3 billion in pretax income, but ended up owing nothing to Uncle Sam. In fact, it recorded a tax benefit of $1.1 billion. How did this happen? It's complicated. GE in effect consists of two divisions: General Electric Capital and everything else. The everything else--maker of engines, power plants, TV shows and the like--would have paid a 22% tax rate if it was a standalone company. It's GE Capital that keeps the overall tax bill so low. Over the last two years, GE Capital has displayed an uncanny ability to lose lots of money in the U.S. (posting a $6.5 billion loss in 2009), and make lots of money overseas (a $4.3 billion gain). Not only do the U.S. losses balance out the overseas gains, but GE can defer taxes on that overseas income indefinitely. It's the tax benefit of overseas operations that is the biggest reason why multinationals end up with lower tax rates than the rest of us.

Note: Can you believe that GE not only pays no taxes, they actually get credit from the US government? They ship US jobs overseas and then reap huge tax benefits as a result. What's wrong with this picture? For a wealth of media news articles on the hidden manipulations of major financial corporations, click here.

 


 

BlackLight's physics-defying promise: Cheap power from water
2008-07-02, CNN Money
http://money.cnn.com/2008/07/01/smallbusiness/blacklight.fsb/index.htm

Imagine being able to convert water into a boundless source of cheap energy. That's what BlackLight Power, a 25-employee firm in Cranbury, N.J., says it can do. The only problem: Most scientists say that company's technology violates the basic laws of physics. Such skepticism doesn't daunt Dr. Randell Mills, a Harvard-trained physician and founder of BlackLight, who recently claimed that he has created a working fuel cell using the world's most pervasive element: the hydrogen found in water. Mills says he has a market-ready product: a fuel cell that produces a chemical reaction to alter hydrogen atoms. The fuel cell releases heat that turns water into steam, which drives electric turbines. The working models in his lab generate 50 kilowatts of electricity - enough to power six or seven houses. But these, Mills says, can be scaled [up] to drive a large, electric power plant. The inventor claims this electricity will cost less than 2 cents per kilowatt-hour, which compares to a national average of 8.9 cents. Mills developed the patented cocktail that enables the reaction - a solid fuel made of hydrogen and a sodium hydride catalyst - only a year ago. (He recently posted instructions on the company's Web site, blacklightpower.com). Now that the device is ready for commercialization, he says, BlackLight is negotiating with several utilities and architecture and engineering firms. The business, Mills says, has attracted $60 million in funding from wealthy individuals, investment firms ... and it is no longer seeking money. BlackLight's board of directors reads like a Who's Who of finance and energy leaders.

Note: For two New York Times articles showing the viability of this amazing technology, click here and here. For many other exciting major media news articles on new energy inventions, click here.

 


 

Political ties to a secretive religious group
2008-04-03, MSNBC News
http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/03/857959.aspx

For more than 50 years, the National Prayer Breakfast has been a Washington institution. Every president has attended the breakfast since Eisenhower. Besides the presidents ... the one constant presence at the National Prayer Breakfast has been Douglas Coe. Although he’s not an ordained minister, the 79-year-old Coe is the most important religious leader you've never seen or heard. Scores of senators in both parties ... go to small weekly Senate prayer groups that Coe attends, [including] senators John McCain, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Observers who have investigated Coe’s group, called The Fellowship Foundation, [describe] a secretive organization. Coe repeatedly urges a personal commitment to Jesus Christ. It’s a commitment Coe compares to the blind devotion that Adolph Hitler demanded. "Hitler, Goebbels and Himmler. Think of the immense power these three men had.” Coe also quoted Jesus and said: “One of the things [Jesus] said is 'If any man comes to me and does not hate his father, mother, brother, sister, his own life, he can't be a disciple.’" Writer Jeff Sharlet ... lived among Coe's followers six years ago, and came out troubled by their secrecy and rhetoric. “We were being taught the leadership lessons of Hitler, Lenin and Mao. Hitler’s genocide wasn’t really an issue for them. It was the strength that he emulated,” said Sharlet, who ... has now written about The Fellowship, also known to insiders as The Family, in [a] book called The Family: The Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart of American Power.

Note: This article strangely has been removed from the MSNBC website, though you can still access it using the Internet Archive. Watch the incredible four-minute NBC video clip showing Coe praising a communist Red Guard member for cutting the head off his mother at this link. For more on Coe's powerful links to Congress and corruption, see the MSNBC article available here. And for powerful inside information from a mind programmer who claims to have escaped from "the family," and another who says he is from a very high level there, click here and here. To develop an understanding of the bigger picture behind all of this, click here.

 


 

A New Way to Fight Cancer?
2007-01-23, Newsweek
http://www.newsweek.com/2007/02/22/a-new-way-to-fight-cancer.html

There are no magic bullets in the fight against cancer: that's the first thing every responsible scientist mentions when discussing a possible new treatment, no matter how promising. If there were a magic bullet, though, it might be something like dichloroacetate, or DCA, a drug that kills cancer cells by exploiting a fundamental weakness found in a wide range of solid tumors. So far, though, it kills them just in test tubes and in rats infected with human cancer cells; it has never been tested against cancer in living human beings. DCA ... is an existing drug whose side effects are well-studied and relatively tolerable. Also, it's a small molecule that might be able to cross the blood-brain barrier to reach otherwise intractable brain tumors. Within days after a technical paper on DCA appeared in the journal Cancer Cell last week, the lead author, Dr. Evangelos Michelakis of the University of Alberta, was deluged with calls and e-mails from prospective patients—to whom he can say only, “Hang in there.” DCA is a remarkably simple molecule. It acts in the body to promote the activity of the mitochondria. Researchers have assumed that the mitochondria in cancer cells were irreparably damaged. But Michelakis wondered if that was really true. With his colleagues he used DCA to turn back on the mitochondria in cancer cells—which promptly died. One of the great things about DCA is that it's a simple compound, in the public domain, and could be produced for pennies a dose. But that's also a problem, because big drug companies are unlikely to spend a billion dollars or so on large-scale clinical trials for a compound they can't patent. (Anyone interested in helping can click here)

Note: For a 2010 follow-up by Dr. Michelakis with promising results, click here and watch a 10-minute video at this link. For the DCA website, click here. Thank you Newsweek for this important article. Why haven't any other mass media reported this major story? Why aren't many millions of dollars being poured into research? Notice even Newsweek acknowledges the drug companies are not interested in finding a cure for cancer if they can't make a profit from it. Some suspect the drug companies have even suppressed cancer cures found in the past. For one amazing example of this, click here. More on DCA available here.

 


 

Free-hug man speaks out
2006-09-28, Sydney Morning Herald (Australia's leading newspaper)
http://www.smh.com.au/news/music/freehug-man-speaks-out/2006/09/28/1159337257...

The man behind the latest YouTube sensation has spoken out for the first time about his global cuddling controversy. Serial hugger Juan Mann describes the free hugs he hands out...as fast-food emotion. His cuddling campaign received an international dose of publicity today, after a clip showing his public displays of affection won a coveted front page spot on the video sharing website. An American television audience of millions also watched him at work, when the video was broadcast on the prime-time breakfast program Good Morning America yesterday. Today, the hugger was at it again, brandishing his "free hugs" sign in the busy pedestrian thoroughfare, and having quite a few people take him up on his offer. "It's a way to make people smile," Mann said. "For every person who gets a hug, you see five walk past with a smile on their face." But his efforts to spread the love became a little too popular for some people's liking, according to a blurb on the YouTube video, which said: "As this symbol of human hope spread across the city, police and officials ordered the Free Hugs campaign BANNED." Undeterred, Mann collected more than 10,000 signatures on a petition he presented to the City of Sydney council. Demands for a halt to the hugs petered out shortly after, and the end of the clip shows Mann hugging an official. City worker Elly Mitchell, who handed out a few free hugs on her lunch break today, said she was inspired to organise [an] event after seeing the video online. "We're going to hug the city," Ms Mitchell said.

Note: If you haven't seen this powerfully inspiring four-minute video clip, join the over 10 million who have by clicking here. The free hugs movement is rapidly spreading around the world! Click here and here to see more. For several other short, deeply inspiring videos, click here.

 


 

'Bonesmen' for president
2004-03-10, MSNBC News
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4500423

Pres. Bush and John Kerry were both members of the secret organization. ‘Skull and Bones’ dates to 1832. It was in fact a reaction to a secret society, the Masons. Founder William Huntington Russell thought of his little enclave as sort of anti-Masons and as a home for the wealthy and the powerful ... who would do anything for another Bonesman. Each year, 15 young undergraduate seniors are tapped for membership. Members of ‘Skull and Bones’ gather on High Street in the Yale campus at the tomb. New members, the neophytes, are expected to do things like lie in coffins, wrestle in mud, kiss a skull, and confess their sexual histories in front of the group to bond themselves together. Once you‘re in, you‘re in: ‘Skull and Bones’ is for life. There are a lot of [famous] Bonesmen ... Henry Luce, who created “TIME” magazine; Harold Stanley, founder of Morgan Stanley; William F. Buckley; Averell Harriman, long-time governor of New York. And then there are the presidents: William Howard Taft, whose father, Alphonso, had helped found the group; George Herbert Walker Bush, whose father, Prescott, was a Bonesman and a senator; the current President Bush. [And there's] John Kerry, Bonesman class of ‘66. His wife Teresa Kerry‘s first husband, John Heinz ... was ‘Skull and Bones.’ Both Bush and Kerry refused to answer ‘Meet the Press’ host Tim Russert when asked about the organization. Alexandra Robbins, author of “Secrets of the Tombs" [said] "The sole purpose of Skull and Bones is to get members into positions of power and then to have those members hire other members to prominent positions, which is something that President Bush has done."

Note: For a highly revealing, four-minute CNN News clip on Skull and Bones, click here. For other major media video clips reporting on this powerful secret society, click here. Many have claimed that secret societies have not had much influence on world politics. This article and videos raises many serious questions about this. For those interested in exploring reliable information covering the big picture of how and why these secret societies are using government-sponsored mind control programs to achieve their agenda, click here. And for other revealing media news articles on powerful secret societies, click here.

 


 

Alleged [9/11] Hijackers May Have Trained At U.S. Bases
2001-09-14, Newsweek Magazine
http://www.newsweek.com/2001/09/14/alleged-hijackers-may-have-trained-at-u-s-...

U.S. military sources have given the FBI information that suggests five of the alleged hijackers of the planes that were used in [the 9/11] terror attacks received training at secure U.S. military installations in the 1990s. Three of the alleged hijackers listed their address on drivers licenses and car registrations as the Naval Air Station in Pensacola, Fla. -- known as the "Cradle of U.S. Navy Aviation," according to a high-ranking U.S. Navy source. Another of the alleged hijackers may have been trained in strategy and tactics at the Air War College in Montgomery, Ala., said another high-ranking Pentagon official. The fifth man may have received language instruction at Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio, Tex. Both were former Saudi Air Force pilots who had come to the United States, according to the Pentagon source. The five men were on a list of 19 people identified as hijackers by the FBI on [September 14]. The three foreign nationals training in Pensacola appear to be Saeed Alghamdi and Ahmad Alnami, who were among the four men who allegedly commandeered United Airlines Flight 93. That flight [ended in] rural Pennsylvania. The third man who may have trained in Pensacola, Ahmed Alghamdi, allegedly helped highjack United Airlines Flight 75, which hit the south tower of the World Trade Center. Military records show that the three used as their address 10 Radford Boulevard, a base roadway on which residences for foreign-military flight trainees are located.

Note: For more on this vitally important news, see the Washington Post news article available here and the Los Angeles Times news article here. Several of the alleged hijackers also contacted US media shortly after 9/11 to report that they were alive and were not on the hijacked planes. See the BBC News and Times of London news articles on this. Yet the 9/11 Commission Report lists these men as the official hijackers at this link. So what's really going on here? For many other major media news articles suggesting that rogue elements of government were involved in 9/11, click here. For our reliable 9/11 Information Center, click here.

 


 

When Seeing and Hearing Isn't Believing
1999-02-01, Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/dotmil/arkin020199.htm

"Gentlemen! We have called you together to inform you that we are going to overthrow the United States government." So begins a statement being delivered by Gen. Carl W. Steiner. At least the voice sounds amazingly like him. But it is not Steiner. It is the result of voice "morphing" technology developed at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. Psychological operations ... PSYOPS, as the military calls it, seek to exploit human vulnerabilities in enemy governments, militaries and populations to pursue national and battlefield objectives. Covert operators kicked around the idea of creating a computer-faked videotape of Saddam Hussein crying or showing other such manly weaknesses, or in some sexually compromising situation. The nascent plan was for the tapes to be flooded into Iraq and the Arab world. The tape war never proceeded ... but the "strategic" PSYOPS scheming didn't die. What if the U.S. projected a holographic image of Allah floating over Baghdad urging the Iraqi people and Army to rise up against Saddam? According to a military physicist given the task of looking into the hologram idea, the feasibility had been established of projecting large, three-dimensional objects that appeared to float in the air. A super secret program was established in 1994 to pursue the very technology for PSYOPS application. The "Holographic Projector" is described in a classified Air Force document as a system to "project information power from space ... for special operations deception missions."

Note: If the above link fails, click here. If you want to understand some of the many hidden capabilities of the U.S. military, this article is a must read. For other revealing news articles on the use of these "nonlethal" weapons, click here.

 


 

C.I.A. Data Show 14-Year Project On Controlling Human Behavior
1977-07-21, New York Times
http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F60A1FFC3E59157493C3AB178CD85...

The Central Intelligence Agency conducted a 14-year program to find ways to "control human behavior" through the use of chemical, biological and radiological material, according to agency documents made public today by John Marks. The documents ... suggested broader experimentation on unwitting humans by the intelligence agency or its paid researchers than had been publicly known before. Mr. Marks distributed 20 documents that described the following incidents, among others: In 1956, the C.I.A. contracted with a private physician to test "bulbocapnine," a drug that can cause stupor or induce a catatonic state, on monkeys and "convicts incarcerated at" an unnamed state penitentiary. A letter from an unnamed C.I.A. official in 1949 discussed ways of killing people without leaving a trace. "I believe that there are two chemical substances which would be most useful in that they would leave no characteristic pathological findings," the letter said. In 1952, two Russian agents who were "suspected of being doubled" were interrogated using "narcohypnotic" methods. The two men were given sodium pentothal and a stimulant. One interrogation produced a "remarkable" regression, the papers said, during which "the subject actually relived certain past activities of his life. The subject totally accepted Mr. [name deleted] as an old and trusted and beloved personal friend whom the subject had known in years past in Georgia, U.S.S.R." The C.I.A. conducted secret medical experiments from 1949 through 1963 under the code names Bluebird, Artichoke, MK Ultra and MK Delta.

Note: If the above link fails, click here. For a one-minute video clip showing Congressional testimony on a dart gun which causes a heart attack without leaving any evidence, click here. For lots more reliable, verifiable information suggesting a major cover-up of government mind control programs, click here. For other revealing news articles on mind control, click here.

 


 

Hypnotic Experimentation and Research
1954-02-10, Declassified CIA Document (Verify using note below)
http://www.WantToKnow.info/mind_control/foia_mind_control/190691_assassins_pr...

A posthypnotic of the night before (pointed finger, you will sleep) was enacted. Misses [deleted] and [deleted] immediately progressed to a deep hypnotic state with no further suggestion. Miss [deleted] was then instructed (having previously expressed a fear of firearms in any fashion) that she would use every method at her disposal to awaken Miss [deleted] (now in a deep hypnotic sleep) and failing this, she would pick up a pistol nearby and fire it at Miss [deleted]. She was instructed that her rage would be so great that she would not hesitate to “kill” [deleted] for failing to awaken. Miss [deleted] carried out these suggestions to the letter including firing the (unloaded) gun at [deleted] and then proceeding to fall into a deep sleep. Both were awakened and expressed complete amnesia for the entire sequence. Miss [deleted] was again handed the gun, which she refused (in an awakened state) to pick up or accept from the operator. She expressed absolute denial that the foregoing sequence had happened.

Note: This text is quoted from page 1 of declassified CIA document MORI ID 190691. To verify the statement in the text, make a FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) request as described here, or directly view a scanned copy online here. To access thousands of pages of declassified CIA mind control documents online, click here. For lots more reliable information on this crucial topic, click here. For many revealing news articles on mind control, click here.

 


 

Massive Pentagon Child Pornography Accusations Not Investigated
2011-01-06, CNN
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1101/06/acd.02.html

The Pentagon porn story began in 2006. An Immigration and Customs Enforcement [ICE] child pornography sting operation called Project Flicker produced payment records of about 5,200 people, many of whom provided Army or fleet zip codes or military e-mail addresses. Subsequently, the Pentagon's investigative branch, DCIS, began going through the ICE list to identify who actually was a DOD employee. The investigation, however, only ran for eight months, and only cross-checked some 3,500 names for Pentagon ties. According to DCIS documents revealed in a Freedom of Information Act request, out of that 3,500, investigators uncovered 264 employees or contractors, including staffers for the secretary of defense. Nine people had top security clearances. But only about 20 percent of those 264 people were completely investigated. Fewer still were prosecuted. After about eight months, the entire probe was halted. It left about 1,700 names totally unchecked, 1,700 alleged kiddie porn customers, an unknown number of whom may still work in some capacity for the Defense Department. Late last summer, after investigations by "The Boston Globe" and Yahoo! News revealed the figures, a Pentagon spokesman promised to reopen the investigation, conceding that DCIS had stopped due to lack of resources. DCIS says it is now revisiting all 5,200 names. They have now identified 302 employees or staffers. [Yet] of the 302 people confirmed as DOD personnel or contractors, only 70 of them were actually investigated.

Note: To see the CNN video clip of this important news, click here. Isn't it interesting that the Pentagon, with it's huge budget, claims the investigation was stopped due to "lack of resources." If you are ready to see how investigations into a massive child sex abuse ring have led to the highest levels of government, watch the suppressed Discovery Channel documentary "Conspiracy of Silence," available here.

 


 

Predator Priests Shuffled Around Globe
2010-04-14, CBS News/Associated Press
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/04/14/world/main6397279.shtml

There he was, five decades later, the priest who had raped Joe Callander in Massachusetts. The photo in the Roman Catholic newsletter showed him with a smile across his wrinkled face, near-naked Amazon Indian children in his arms and at his feet. The Rev. Mario Pezzotti was working with children and supervising other priests in Brazil. It's not an isolated example. In an investigation spanning 21 countries across six continents, The Associated Press found 30 cases of priests accused of abuse who were transferred or moved abroad. Some escaped police investigations. Many had access to children in another country, and some abused again. A priest who admitted to abuse in Los Angeles went to the Philippines, where U.S. church officials mailed him checks and advised him not to reveal their source. A priest in Canada was convicted of sexual abuse and then moved to France, where he was convicted of abuse again in 2005. Another priest was moved back and forth between Ireland and England, despite being diagnosed as a pederast, a man who commits sodomy with boys. "The pattern is if a priest gets into trouble and it's close to becoming a scandal or if the law might get involved, they send them to the missions abroad," said Richard Sipe, a former Benedictine monk and critic of what he says is a practice of international transfers of accused and admitted priest child abusers. "Anything to avoid a scandal."

Note: This is only the tip of the iceberg. If you want to understand how pedophile rings have infiltrated the highest levels of government, don't miss the powerful Discovery Channel documentary on this available here.

 


 

 

 

 

 


Top of page | Home | Spread the Word | News | What You Can Do | About Us | Contact Us | Donate

 

 

 

     by tomnln                   

Contact Information  tomnln@cox.net

Page Visited

Hit Counter

Times