more of McADAMS BULLSHIT BELOW
THE PERSONAL ABUSE HIS LACKEYS SHOWER ON ME DOESN'T SEEM TO BOTHER HIM AT ALL ! ! !
Tom,
Please don't bother to send posts saying somebody lied. They will be summarily deleted.
.John
Tom,
I'm getting tired of reposting dozens of your messages that say exacly the same thing. That's spam.
From now on, I'll summarily delete any messages about "Harlendale" (unless you actually post new information) and all messages about how somebody has not read the 26 volumes.
.John
AGAIN McADAMS BABYSITS HIS LACKEYS
ALL HEY HAVE TO DO IS TO ADDRESS THE QUESTION ONCE THEY ARE OFFICIAL REPORTS OF OSWALD BEING HOUSED ALONG WITHH SEVERAL CIA SPONSORED ANTI CASTRO CUBAN ORGANIZATIONS AT 3126 HARLENDALE AVENUE IN DALLAS ! ! !
APPARENTLTLY THE CIA WANTED TO SAVE TAX PAYERS MONEY BY HOUSING MANY OF THEIR GROUPS TOGETHER ! !
SEE>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/3126%20%20HARLENDALE.htm
On Sun, 25 Jan 2015, tomnln@cox.net wrote:
> oh boy ! ! ! ! !
> another gmail participant ! ! ! ! he orgasim; why don't you tell us
> exactly why Oswald was housed along with several cia sponsor
> anti-castro cub organizatis at 326 harlendale avenue in dallas ? ? ?
>
> see>>> http://www.whokilledjfk.net/3126%20%20HARLENDALE.htm
> ======================================================================
> =====
> =======
>
>
>
> Jerry Organ <jerryorg123@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The brake light is only lit on one side of the car because of
>> backlighting and the Continental's tail-light being wraparound.
>>
>> On another point, Ford didn't "move" the so-called back wound. He
>> correctly insisted that terming it entering at the back of the base
>> of the neck was more precise and not "misleading" as the term "back wound"
>> was.
>
> --
> -------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
> Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB
>
On Sun, 25 Jan 2015, tomnln@cox.net wrote:
> Anthony Marsh <anthony.marsh@comcast.net> wrote:
>> On 1/22/2015 8:59 PM, mainframetech wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 1:46:00 PM UTC-5, bigdog wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> 20. 33 of 59 witnesses said the JFK limo came to a FULL stop. The
>>>>> probability they would all be mistaken is ZERO. This proves that
>>>>> the Zapruder film was altered since it does not show a full stop.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That means that 26 out of 59 said it didn't come to a full stop.
>>>> What are the odds they could all be mistaken?
>>>
>>>
>>> Wrong again! 26 people NOT saying it came to a stop proves
>>> nothing. If they said 'it did NOT stop', then they might be saying
>>> something, but we would have to then ask them 'did it slow
>>> significantly'? So your contention is useless.
>>>
>>
>> You are conflating. Slowing significantly is not stopping.
>>
>>> Cops are trained to be observant, so maybe this will help those
>>> that aren't sure of the limo's stopping or 'almost stopping':
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrX8lsb2WTk
>>>
>>> Note the brake lights coming on, and Hargis's statement.
>>>
>>
>> The brake lights never come on.
> ======================================================================
> ===== === tony marsh lies to protect the warren report lies again ! !
> !
> ======================================================================
> =====
>>> Chris
>>>
>
> --
> -------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
> Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB
>